Talk:2015 6 Hours of Spa-Francorchamps/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Harrias (talk · contribs) 10:59, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Me again!

"record-braking" typo again.
- Need to keep an eye out for doing this. Fixed MWright96 (talk) 12:52, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"average time of 2:7.761" should be "2:07.761"
- Done MWright96 (talk)
"Gianmaria Bruni set the fastest class individual lap late in the session but was 0.070 seconds off the Aston Martin's pace.." I don't understand how it was the fastest, BUT slower than another car. Was that car in another class?
- Removed that certain fact
Per MOS:ACCESS, don't just use bold text to indicate something; add a symbol too.
- Used the double digger symbol for identify the class pole sitters

"..prompting the stewards to call him up to their office." He had to stop racing to go up to their office, or he went up when he was relieved, or after the race?
- Hartley went up to the stewards after he was relieved. MWright96 (talk) 12:52, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
"The No. 17 Porsche was issued with a 15-second, stop-and-go penalty.." Worth clarifying this was the Hartley incident above; it isn't immediately obvious.
- Done MWright96 (talk) 12:52, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
"record-braking" again.
- Done MWright96 (talk) 12:52, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Per MOS:FLAG, accompany flags with country names.
- To the best of my knowledge, this way is not preferred by Wikipedia's motorsport community. MWright96 (talk) 12:52, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - I won't hold up the GA over this, but it would be worth having a discussion about this in the appropriate WikiProjects. Many of these style guides were created before a lot of the current MOS guidelines, and haven't been sufficiently updated. Harrias ^talk 13:50, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Again, don't just use bold to indicate a class winner.
- Done MWright96 (talk) 12:52, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Overall, again, a good piece of work, nicely done. Harrias ^talk 10:59, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Harrias: Thank you again for another review. Have made adjustments where possible. MWright96 (talk) 12:52, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Great work, thanks. Harrias ^talk 13:50, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]