Talk:2015 6 Hours of Silverstone/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: HawkAussie (talk · contribs) 00:05, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
I will be happy to take this review.
- @HawkAussie: Almost three weeks since this review was initiated. What is the state of this nomination? MWright96 (talk) 17:08, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
Lead
[edit]- Le Mans Prototype is a duplicated link in the third paragraph as there is already one in the first paragraph.
- The second-placed car was Richard Lietz and Michael Christensen's Porsche Team Manthey 911 RSR - Noticed that compared to the rest of the lead, this has the drivers before the car and not the other way round.
Entry list
[edit]- Their G-Drive Racing team, which won four races in 2014... - Why isn't G-Drive Racing team not linked here.
- SMP Racing is a duplicate link with the one in the second paragraph. Also Porsche Team Manthey, Aston Martin Racing and Manthey Racing has duplicate links that was further up in that paragraph.
Preview
[edit]- No issues here
Practice
[edit]- ...before teammate Benoît Tréluyer's sister No. 7 entry ended as the... - Needs a little bit more clear cut there
- ...off the slippery track and into Copse corner's gravel trap. - Is there meant to be a reference at the end of this sentence?
Qualifying
[edit]- ...which his co-driver Hartley improved on in clear air, with a 1 minute,... - there needs to be a comma or something to split that.
- in fifth were 3+1⁄2 seconds slower... - shouldn't be that something like 3.5 seconds or something like that.
- ...gave Aston Martin first to third in class in the team's... - Probably something like they were top three in class instead of having it from first to third.
Race
[edit]- Forty-one minutes in the first full course yellow... - That is missing either a comma or a couple of words to make this flow better. Maybe something like "Forty-one minutes in, the first full yellow..."
- With that same sentence, maybe split that into two sentences instead of one long one.
- Several drivers in the top categories... - It's not quite clear on what categories we are talking. I assume this is about LMP1 and LMP2 but it's not clear.
- Racing resumed in the 46th minute with Webber... - Maybe change it to only have it as a time difference between when it was a yellow flag and when it restarted.
- ...because it was on an... - Shouldn't this be "because they were on an..."
- ...used his being delayed by Danny Watts... - Confused on where this section was going.
- in avoidance hitting a thin plastic - Needs a comma between avoidance and hitting
- corner to pass Lieb for third three - Add a comma after third.
- at the front of the car and Jarvis overtook it. - Wouldn't it be easier to split the two so it ends at the front of the car and then say that Jarvis passed them.
- ...and then took up fuel. - Remove the word up here.
- ...is a six-our sprint race. - Missing the H
Final comments
[edit]Other than those minor things that need to be fixed, I reckon this would be good to go.
- @HawkAussie: Think I have addressed everything. Could you please take another look? Thank you MWright96 (talk) 08:36, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- @MWright96: That is all good. HawkAussie (talk) 08:39, 3 January 2022 (UTC)