Jump to content

Talk:2015–16 La Liga

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Positions by round

[edit]

Though it is quite obvious the Positions by Round table should exist here, as it does in most football league season articles, some users are constantly removing it. So I am made to start a discussion about this matter. The table had a very long history in all football articles and it was quite stable as well. What do you think?OlJa 09:39, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If it's only a problem about adding sources and references, there are a lot of websites that keep the standings week by week. E.g., the famous BDFutbol. I wouldn't remove it but you decide. Asturkian (talk) 18:48, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Asturkian: That's it, thank you.OlJa 09:39, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 20 February 2016

[edit]

"Please correct the Zamora trophy list. The list has lots of inaccuracies. I have updated the list with details from http://www.foxsports.com/soccer/stats?competition=2"


Zamora Trophy

[edit]

The Zamora Trophy is awarded by newspaper Marca to the goalkeeper with least goals-to-games ratio. Keepers must play at least 28 games of 60 or more minutes to be eligible for the trophy.[citation needed]

As of 20 February 2016. [1]
Rank Name Club Goals
Against
Matches Average
1 Slovenia Jan Oblak Atlético Madrid 11 24 0.46
2 Chile Claudio Bravo Barcelona 13 21 0.61
3 France Alphonse Areola Villarreal 18 24 0.75
4 Costa Rica Keylor Navas Real Madrid 19 22 0.86
5 Cameroon Carlos Kameni Malaga 21 24 0.88

Nahomyaja (talk) 22:33, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "Trofeo Zamora Liga BBVA - MARCA.com". MARCA.com.
Not done As you may have seen there is a source for that section with other numbers and your source does not list goalkeepers matches and goals without being WP:OR. Qed237 (talk) 22:42, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tie breaker criteria

[edit]

The primary tie breaker criteria in La Liga is head to head points, but the table always ignores that and goes by goal difference instead. Like right now Sporting is listed as 16th and Rayo 17th, even though they have the same points and Rayo has Sporting beat on head to head 4-1. Is there a reason for this that I'm just not getting? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:241:100:4880:28DC:B291:E015:625E (talk) 23:06, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mainly, I think it is because it takes time and energy for those updating the tables to look up head-to-head matches all the time so it is very easy to sort by goal differential. Also the tiebreakers are often not officially used until all matches has been played and the actual position the teams are in at the moment are not very important. But if you or anyone else wants to add head-to-head notes that is fine. I could take a look later. Qed237 (talk) 23:11, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2015–16 La Liga. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:54, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]