Talk:2015–16 College Football Playoff/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: PCN02WPS (talk · contribs) 00:47, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: CosXZ (talk · contribs) 20:21, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
· · · |
Stable?
[edit]Yes Cos (X + Z) 20:21, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
Copyvio?
[edit]Earwig shows a 3.8% due to simple phrases such as "the top four teams". Cos (X + Z) 20:21, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
Sources
[edit]- sources are styled well.
- all sources are reliable except for [32] which is a blog.
- doing a spot check of all the sources in 4 rounds.
- Round 1
- [9].
- [27].
- [17].
- [39].
- [15].
- [7].? can't access
- [8].? Source says Baylor was No. 4 not No. 6.
- [13].
- [6].