Talk:2014 Women's Rugby World Cup

Rugby union Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rugby union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rugby union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rugby unionWikipedia:WikiProject Rugby unionTemplate:WikiProject Rugby unionrugby union articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's sport Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada - Spain score

For the Canada - Spain match the 2014 Women's Rugby World Cup website says the score was 31 - 5 (http://www.rwcwomens.com/home/matches/match=14616/index.html) but everywhere else says 31 - 7, what was the actual score? Who should we accept as being right? - okaeverywhere (talk) 02:33, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The TV footage listed the score as 31-7, however, reviewing the match footage, the commentator clearly says "and the conversion goes begging", without showing the kick. Have corrected the score.Magpieram (talk) 23:50, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Women's match format

I noticed in the pools section that there is a different format for scores between the pools and the knock-out stage. The pools seems to be a specialised format for women's rugby, while the knock-out phase seems to be the general rugby scores format.Magpieram (talk) 05:32, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Presuming the finals are counted as Test matches and the numbering of the knockout stage matches follows the last pool match (i.e. no gaps in the sequence due to matches outside the tournament) then I make the sequence as follows:

1. [1075] 14:00 13 August 2014 South Africa 25–24 Samoa

3. [1077] 16:15 13 August 2014 Spain 18–5 Kazakhstan

7. [1081] 12:00 17 August 2014 Samoa 31–0 Kazakhstan

8. [1082] 14:00 17 August 2014 South Africa 0–36 Spain

5. [1079] 18:30 13 August 2014 Australia 20–23 United States

2. [1076] 15:45 13 August 2014 New Zealand 63–7 Wales

10. [1084] 16:00 17 August 2014 Australia 30–3 Wales

9. [1083] 14:15 17 August 2014 United States 5–55 New Zealand

4. [1078] 18:00 13 August 2014 Ireland 7–40 England

6. [1080] 20:45 13 August 2014 France 16–18 Canada

11. [1085] 16:30 17 August 2014 Ireland 18–25 France

12. [1086] 18:45 17 August 2014 England 21–9 Canada

Can anyone confirm this? If so, the article should be updated with this numbering using the specialised women's format. -- Ham105 (talk) 19:23, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on 2014 Women's Rugby World Cup. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:04, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2014 Women's Rugby World Cup. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:54, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]