This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
"Preferred" was probably not the best choice of words, but there are several dozen articles on U.S. Senate elections in Oregon, another couple dozen on governor's elections, plus house and ballot measures, etc. All those use the flat-style template, and very few articles use the vertical infobox style one. There was a discussion about it a while ago, and I was simply implementing what I perceived to be the consensus. Feel free to reopen a discussion if you think necessary. Thanks! --Esprqii (talk) 21:53, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I don't have a problem with it. Although I think we should probably leave the other one up there too, since every other state in this article and the years before it used the square one at the top. But either way... Thanks for your time. Light-jet pilot (talk) 06:20, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Seems like overkill to have two templates to me, especially since no one was even bothering to update the infobox one (which I have now done). But I'll worry about it 2014. --Esprqii (talk) 18:44, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
