Talk:2014–15 Louisville Cardinals men's basketball team

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject College basketball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college basketball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College basketballWikipedia:WikiProject College basketballTemplate:WikiProject College basketballcollege basketball articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Louisville Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Kentucky portal This article is supported by WikiProject Louisville (assessed as Mid-importance).

Stub or not?

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Is this article a stub?

IE is the tabular content to be ignored in assessing whether it is a stub?Rathfelder (talk) 20:32, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I disagreed in that there is only two small paragraphs of prose, and that we build non-list articles out of prose, not tables. Stevie is the man! ^{Talk • Work} 20:41, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, this would be considered a stub. I think that tables are generally ignored, for instance an article just made of tables could never get a rating of Stub, B, C, GA, etc. and would simply get a "list" rating. So in a way, that shows that tables arent really considered as content if you get what Im saying. Tortle (talk) 23:06, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There are many articles consisting almost entirely of tables - election results and histories of sports events - which are not regarded as stubs. I don't understands what you mean by "rating of Stub, B, C, GA". Can you explain please?Rathfelder (talk) 08:27, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Different Wikiprojects have similar but different rating systems. For the college basketball project tables are not considered when rating an article. So since there are only a couple paragraphs with a basic description of the subject with few references this would qualify to me as a stub, with just a little more i could see this go to a start rating. Hope that gave you more of an understanding on the matter. Littlekelv (talk) 18:40, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]