Talk:2014–15 Euroleague
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
why they are using european union's flag
[edit]In euroleague they are participating teams from Isreal And Turkey that they are not in Europe and Serbia and Russia that they are not European Union Members — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:2149:8222:5D00:8D7A:910B:19DF:F346 (talk) 21:59, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
attendance
[edit]Wikipedia is only for educational purpuses and the attedance of every game is not an important for the game info do not put it again,someone put it last year and we didnt ban it but the previus years was not included. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:2149:8205:A000:5474:8D3E:5FD8:4963 (talk) 13:57, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Your point? Rather redundant. That's like saying Australia and New Zealand are not part of Oceania basketball team, which they are. Turkey, Serbia and Israel are eligible to take part in the competition, despite that they're not with the European Union. 70.45.65.243 (talk) 21 ===:15, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Group F ranking: Fenerbahce must be 1st
[edit]In Group F, Fenerbahce must be placed 1st. Because: All (Fenerbahce, Olympiacos, CSKA) have 8 wins, and Fenerbahce proved superiority to both CSKA and Olympiacos in tie situation. Fenerbahce realized all matches (home and road) versus both CSKA and Olympiacos. Fenerbahce win margin is superior to CSKA. (vs81-84, at 75-81) Fenerbahce win margin is superior to Olympiacos. (vs68-74, at64-73)
One Wiki user places Olympiacos in the 1st place. That is wrong. Because, to look at and evaluate the triple tie superiority, all of the matches among 3 teams must be finished. There remains Olympiacos-CSKA match that will be played.
Assume that this was the last week of Euroleague and wins/tie margins existed like this one. How can one place a team that became superior to all of the tied teams separately below any of the tied ones? Win/Loss accounting in tie situation is taken into account when all the matches among the tied ones in question realized!212.175.32.21 (talk) 08:38, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
- First, we must follow the official standings at Euroleague website. And second, game CSKA–Olympiacos is not played, and as all the games between tied teams are not played, the point difference continues being the main criteria for tiebreaking. So, CSKA goes first with +76, FB with +63 and Oly with +57. Asturkian (talk) 09:30, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
Can please someone answer for the attendance also? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:2149:8221:4E00:983E:E39B:C506:4405 (talk) 15:25, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
cverna zvezda
[edit]Last week someone from Serbia put stadiums picture next to the attendances which was also deleted. and now i found the same picture on groups page [[File:ZvezdaGalata2015.jpg|thumb|250px|right|Euroleague game: Red Star - Galatasaray what is that picture related with the standings and the article? wikipedia turns to be a really untustfull source while everyone can post anything please start to patrol your pages more often — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.237.45.139 (talk) 16:41, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Attendances and statistics
[edit]Here is not a social network every week after euroleague games im entering here and spent time of my life for educational purpuses im taking the statistics from Euroleague.net and some people keep change it for example milos teodsic first on assist while on Euroleagues page he is 5th.Im tirred for keep correcting it from now on anything is not accurate by official page is going to be deleted and not getting correct because it's a waste of time. If the Wikipedias people will not pay attention on that thing very soon the whole page will be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:2149:8213:3100:DFB:3602:9D0A:E1C5 (talk) 16:07, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
Protection
[edit]Today i checked again the page and someone had change that statistics again. The statistics either it should be according to Euroleagues page either not existing at all.
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
- Not done: requests for increases to the page protection level should be made at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. Jamietw (talk) 16:28, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
- Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Jamietw (talk) 16:28, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
i dont know how to use those fuctions,the statistics are not accurate acording to EUROLEAGUE.NET page same as the average home attendance Jamietw — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dim.vas.nikol (talk • contribs) 13:22, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Asist
[edit]They keep putting Milos Teodositc first in the list. Please have this on mind. 1st: No matter what the statistics you write here must be accurate acorfing to Euroleagues official page. 2nd: I understand that Milos have bigger average rating than Huertel but because he played less games he is second,if you cant understand that dont get in a trouble next time to write in Wikipedia. It's simple,for example look at the average of Attendance KK cverna Zvezda is first although they had less people than the second place Panathinaikos due to the fact that Panathinaikos played more games in this season than Cverna which eliminated on top 16. plese have this on mind and dont ban an educational purpuse page,thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:2149:822E:C200:309F:A278:C506:2821 (talk) 14:08, 23 April 2015 (UTC)