Talk:2014–15 Central Coast Mariners FC season

Football: Australia / Season Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Australian soccer task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the season article task force.

Beyhan Irmarko

Does anybody know who Beyhan Irmarko is? he was mentioned in the Mariners' twitter update ahead of the FFA Rd of 32 match as the substitute goalkeeper, but I could find no mention of him on the internet. @Rjbsmith? --SuperJew (talk) 08:30, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

According to a later tweet he is a goalkeeper from the Central Coast Mariners Academy squad. I believe he is filling in until Matthew Nash arrives from Bonnyrigg White Eagles at the end of the 2014 National Premier Leagues finals series. Rjbsmith (talk) 22:43, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fixtures

@SuperJew, @Rjbsmith

What order should the fixtures go in? It seems odd to me to prefer "round order" (essentially meaningless) to chronological order. As a reader I'd certainly expect chronological, especially when the round order doesn't really mean anything. In the EPL teams' seasons games are rescheduled all the time and fixture lists are always maintained chronologically. Macosal (talk) 23:22, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

in the tables of result by round and goalscorers by rounds we go by the round as do the FFA --SuperJew (talk) 04:34, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Is that the best way to do it? I feel like people are definitely expecting chronological rather than round order in that list (I was). Macosal (talk) 05:04, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, seems you're the only one. --SuperJew (talk) 05:42, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I guess so, we have only really heard from 2/3 people - may be worth getting some more opinions. Macosal (talk) 08:40, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I can't say I have a strong preference either way. From an editing POV it does make it a little easier to have it in chronological order. Rjbsmith (talk) 08:36, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]