Talk:2013 New Brunswick python attack
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Only one sentence and it's on Google News
[edit]How did this get quoted on Google News ? Because currently [1], there is only one sentence in the whole article ! 70.29.248.145 (talk) 22:18, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Wikitabloid
[edit]This is not encyclopedic. Get a life.
Pzzp (talk) 01:07, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
- Of course it's not encylopedic. But that's not a problem, since Wikipedia is not an encyclopedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.71.152.200 (talk) 04:26, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
This is not a media site
[edit]As Pzzp stated, this not encyclopedic content, nor is it truly informative, especially on the matter of pythons and snake safety. Much of the information is also blatantly incorrect. Truly, this article should be faced with deletion as it's not worthy of even existing. Parks1997 (talk) 05:05, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
"Background" section
[edit]I think a Background section would be good to add, explaining who the boys were, the reptile shop, as well as certain details such as possibly how the python was acquired. I'll potentially add it in the future, but here's an article that would be helpful: https://globalnews.ca/news/769386/misplaced-blame-in-nb-python-deaths-former-reptile-ocean-employee/ B3251 (talk) 03:06, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
- Start-Class Canada-related articles
- Low-importance Canada-related articles
- Start-Class New Brunswick articles
- Low-importance New Brunswick articles
- WikiProject New Brunswick articles
- All WikiProject Canada pages
- Start-Class amphibian and reptile articles
- Low-importance amphibian and reptile articles
- Start-Class amphibian and reptile articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles articles