Talk:2013 Malian parliamentary election

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums

Africa: Mali Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Mali portal This article is supported by WikiProject Mali (assessed as Low-importance).

Parliamentary electoral system

If I can rely on the electoral law of 2006 on the website of the UN (article 157), the parliamentary electoral system is two round majority; there can be districts with more than one seat, in which case voters can only choose among closed lists (article 89) and the list winning a majority of votes gets all the seats. --Bancki (talk) 09:46, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is confirmed by the Inter-Parliamentary Union and by IFES Election Guide, but according to IFES they have only single member districts.--Bancki (talk) 19:57, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A more recent version of the electoral law (consolidated with amendments of 2011) on the website of the Electoral Institute for Sustainable Democracy in Africa (EISA) [1] confirms two round majority, with the possibility of multi-member districts (in that case with closed list majority).--Bancki (talk) 20:11, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Links

>> Low turnout mars Mali's parliamentary vote(Lihaas (talk) 10:11, 16 December 2013 (UTC)).[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Malian parliamentary election, 2013. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131202225345/http://www.iri.org/news-events-press-center/news/largely-peaceful-process-defines-presidential-election-day-mali to http://www.iri.org/news-events-press-center/news/largely-peaceful-process-defines-presidential-election-day-mali

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:32, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

National results

I didn't find any valid source indicating votes for Rally for Mali, Union for the Republic and Democracy and Alliance for Democracy in Mali. The only possibile summary is the following:

ADEMA: 112,248
ADEMA-ADP-Maliba: 11,144
ADEMA-ASMA-CFP: 22,750
ADEMA-CNID: 11,640
ADEMA-CNID-RJP: 10,237
ADEMA-CNID-RPDM: 28,176
ADEMA-CODEM-FARE: 5,963
ADEMA-CODEM-MIRIA: 33,915
ADEMA-CODEM-RPM: 63,168
ADEMA-MPR-URD: 18,088
ADEMA-PARENA: 31,808
ADEMA-RPM: 47,598
ADEMA-URD: 22,584
ADEMA-URD-PRVM-PDES-PARENA: 37,325
ADP-Maliba: 11,293
ADP-Maliba-CODEM: 7,501
ADP-Maliba-MPR: 1,063
AMPC-ADP-Maliba: 1,493
APR: 1,714
APR-CNID: 2,353
APR-UNPR: 1,696
ASMA: 12,497
ASMA-CFP: 28,412
ASMA-CFP-MPR: 7,448
ASMA-CFP-UDD: 3,914
ASMA-CFP-URD-CODEM: 15,103
ASMA-URD-CODEM: 4,941
CDS-URD-FARE: 24,037
CNID: 25,974
CNID-CODEM-RPDM: 12,343
CNID-SADI: 5,108
CNID-UDA-YELEMA-RPDM-CDS-FARE: 5,862
CNID-UDD: 1,322
CNID-URD: 9,629
CODEM: 24,786
CODEM-CNID: 9,815
CODEM-FARE-RPDM: 4,155
CODEM-PACP-UMP-RDP: 3,501
CODEM-RDPM: 2,198
CODEM-RDS: 1,267
CODEM-RPMD-SADI: 4,412
CODEM-UDM-MODEC: 2,735
FAMA-RPDM: 3,688
FARE: 19,116
FARE-UM-RDA: 1,852
FARE-YELEMA: 3,973
Independent: 37,255
MIRIA: 4,040
MODEC: 34,807
MODEC-SADI: 6,904
MPR: 1,421
MPR-CODEM: 10,645
MPR-PARENA: 4,841
MPR-PARENA-MIRIA: 1,775
MPR-SADI: 3,934
MPR-URD-ADEMA: 17,510
MPR-YELEMA: 11,944
Others: 158,599
PARENA: 19521
PARENA): 933
PARENA-ADP-Maliba: 7,021
PARENA-RPC: 7,745
PCR-MPR: 4,529
PCR-UMRDA-PDES: 5,514
PDES: 10,540
PDES-ADEMA: 3,929
PDES-CNID: 5,019
PDES-PARENA: 1,150
PDES-URD-UMRDA: 26,053
PDES-URP: 4,875
PRVM: 17,715
PSP-UMRDA: 17,638
RDPM-SADI: 12,942
RDP-PARENA: 3,781
RPDM: 2,043
RPDM-ADP-Maliba: 28,433
RPDM-CNID-PSDA: 2,214
RPDM-PARENA: 1,470
RPDM-PCR: 2,563
RPDM-PDES: 3,517
RPM: 170,060
RPM-ADEMA: 99,626
RPM-ADP-Maliba: 10,320
RPM-APR-ADEMA: 24,848
RPM-ASMA: 2,893
RPM-CODEM: 12,467
RPM-CODEM-UDD: 29,363
RPM-FARE: 38,945
RPM-MIRIA-FARE: 43,069
RPM-MPR-ADP-Maliba: 11,411
RPM-MPR-FARE: 22,073
RPM-UDD: 12,795
RPM-UM-RDA-SADI: 27,981
RPM-URD: 15,586
RPM-URD-FARE-ADEMA: 43,482
SADI: 17,725
SADI-ADEMA-URD-MPR: 41,876
SADI-CNID: 1,488
SADI-PRVM: 6,968
SADI-RPDM: 1,169
SADI-YELEMA: 1,993
UDA-URD: 3,680
UDD: 21,419
UDD-ASMA-CFP-PDES: 15,858
UDD-CODEM: 2,013
UDD-MPR-SADI-RPDM: 5,452
UDD-PARENA: 6,009
UDD-PSP: 8,653
UDD-RTD: 1,010
UDD-YELEMA-SADI: 5,431
UFDP-PRVM-CODEM: 11,630
UMAM-APR: 2,228
UMAM-PARENA-ASMA: 2,993
UMPC-ADP-Maliba: 4,706
UMPC-CNID: 2,657
UMRDA: 5,622
UM-RDA: 2,339
UMRDA FASO: 9,844
UMRDA-RPDM-UMP: 3,229
UMRDA-RPM: 12,436
UM-RDA-RPM: 20,594
UPPR-RAMAT-MIRIA-ASMA-CFP: 4,877
URD: 181,283
URD-ASMA-CODEM-MPR: 26,013
URD-CODEM: 7,409
URD-CODEM-MPR: 16,023
URD-MPR: 7,697
URD-MPR-PARENA: 15,941
URD-MPR-YELEMA: 7,359
URD-PDES: 31,369
URD-PDES-CODEM-MPR-PIDS: 18,093
URD-PIDS: 6,356
URD-SADI: 7,215
URD-UDD: 6,971
URD-YELEMA-CNID: 18,257
YELEMA: 36,966
YELEMA-ADEMA: 5,707
YELEMA-ASMA-CFP: 5,966
YELEMA-CNID-PCR: 3,792
YELEMA-CODEM: 2122
YELEMA-FARE: 1,771
YELEMA-RTD-ADP-Maliba: 10,692
YELEMA-UDM-UDA: 1,999
YELEMA-URP-FARE: 1,990
Valid votes:: 2,414,474

--151 cp (talk) 15:30, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@151 cp: The figures in the table are from here, which is listed as one of the sources in the table. This site would appear to have full results – is this where you got the figures above? I assume they are first round votes? Number 5 7 16:12, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Number 57: Yes, they are the results of the first round according with abamako.com. I think the criterion used by Adam Carr is absurd: why should we consider the votes obtained by the coalition RPM-ADEMA (and other lists), or RPM-URD (and other lists), as votes obtained by only RPM, or consider votes obtained by URD-ADEMA as votes obtained by only URD, so that we subtract to ADEMA both votes obtained by this list in coalition with RPM and those obtained with URD, falsifying the results significantly? In any case, even if we wanted to use that criterion, RPM obtained 708,715 votes (and not 708,716). --151 cp (talk) 13:16, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's simpler to keep the lists exactly as they are listed in the results, although this would make the seat totals for each party a bit harder to understand. Number 5 7 22:27, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It could be simpler, but it's simplistic: we should indicate real results and not results which are the consequence of our personal re-elaboration. We can indicate only the number of seats... --151 cp (talk) 14:46, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I perhaps worded that badly. The results should be as you've presented them above, i.e. the actual results for the different list combinations. What I meant about the seats was that it wouldn't be entirely clear from the table how many seats each individual party has, unless we did a separate seats-only summary table underneath. Number 5 7 19:57, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, sorry, I understood now. Seats for each list or group of list is available here. The summary of seats is the follow (even if the total is 148, and not 147: so I should verify...):

ADEMA: 1
ADEMA-ADP: 3
ADEMA-ASMA-CFP: 3
ADEMA-CNID-FYT: 2
ADEMA-CODEM-RPM: 7
ADEMA-RPM: 2
ADEMA-URD: 2
ADEMA-URD-PRVM-PDES-PARENA: 5
ASMA-CFP: 3
ASMA-CFP-URD-CODEM: 3
CDS-URD-FARE: 4
CNID-URD: 2
CODEM-CNID: 2
INDEPENDENT: 4
PARENA: 2
RPDM-ADP: 3
RPM: 23
RPM-ADEMA: 12
RPM-ADP: 3
RPM-APR-ADEMA: 3
RPM-CODEM: 3
RPM-FARE: 3
RPM-MIRIA-FARE: 10
RPM-MPR-ADP: 3
RPM-MPR-FARE: 7
RPM-UDD: 3
RPM-URD: 2
RPM-URD-FARE-ADEMA: 5
SADI: 2
SADI-ADEMA-URD-MPR: 6
UMRDA FASO-JIGI-RPM: 2
URD: 6
URD-PDES: 4
URD-YELEMA-CNID: 3

--151 cp (talk) 15:25, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]