Talk:2013–14 Tour de Ski

	Sports portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skiing and Snowboarding, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of skiing and snowboarding articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Skiing and SnowboardingWikipedia:WikiProject Skiing and SnowboardingTemplate:WikiProject Skiing and SnowboardingSkiing and Snowboarding articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Neutrality

This article seems unbalanced regarding the changes that were made right before the start of the Tour. There are no references regarding this, and it seems a bit heavy using words like "ufortunately", "scandal" and "clearly disrupted the balance". The controversies should be mentioned, but it would be better to use quotes from Kowalczyk herself, and let the readers make up their own mind. --Dermeister83 (talk) 16:04, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Swedish Expressen refers to her Facebook page, here: https://www.facebook.com/kibicujjustynie . She's written about her decision to boycott Tour de Ski there, but the posts are in Polish and I can't read Polish. Swedish public television (SVT) quotes her here: http://www.svt.se/sport/vintersport/kowalczyk-hoppas-av-tour-de-ski saying it's because of the ratio between classical and freestyle distances; 5 freestyle and 2 classical after the change was not good for the sport, nor her. It was supposed to be "fifty-fifty" (eg 50% of each style). -- Lejman (talk) 18:31, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I also think it would be meaningful to discuss all the later drop-outs on the tour, notably Marit Björgen so far (due to illness), but Ingvild Östberg, Denise Herrman and Hanna Eriksson (all currently in the top 10) have stated they plan to drop out of the tour and not do the next course. -- Lejman (talk) 18:41, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dermeister83 may be right that the use of the word "scandal" was a little strong but I think that the controversies around the 2013-2014 Tour de Ski need to be mentioned in the Wikipedia article (they were discussed by several TV stations and newspaper articles around the world), not mentioning them would not provide an objective picture to the readers. As noticed by Lejman above, there is sufficient evidence supporting the existence of significant controversy regarding "last minute changes" introduced by the organizers. I am of the opinion that the controversies should be mentioned but in somewhat more modest form avoiding some strong words as suggested by Dermeister83. Quoting Kowalczyk may be difficult because she gave many statements in Polish, some of them very critical towards organizers of Tour de Ski in 2013-2014, quoting these could spark controversies and rise questions regarding accuracy of translation. Author: Mr. X. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.105.0.86 (talk) 12:48, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

World Cup?

Wasn't this part of Skiing World Cup? There is no mention or even link to it. If this Tour no longer belong to World Cup, then ok. 212.50.203.198 (talk) 16:29, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2013–14 Tour de Ski. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071211205836/http://www.tour-de-ski.com:80/ to http://www.tour-de-ski.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:16, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]