Talk:2012 Yiliang earthquakes

A news item involving 2012 Yiliang earthquakes was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 8 September 2012.

Wikipedia

Earthquakes Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Earthquakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of earthquakes, seismology, plate tectonics, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EarthquakesWikipedia:WikiProject EarthquakesTemplate:WikiProject EarthquakesWikiProject Earthquakes articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of 2012 Yiliang earthquakes be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

More info

The earthquake report site lists the death toll as having reached 89 and also gives a bunch of other info collected from various news reports, but tracking down the original sources might not be easy. I just found the death toll listed as 89 at reuters so I'll go update that in the article now. EdwardLane (talk) 09:40, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 2012 Yunnan earthquakes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:05, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Doublet?

The two shocks mentioned in the lead (at 03:19 and 04:16, UTC) certainly look like an earthquake doublet (and not like a typical aftershock sequence), but the source cited for that determination being in Chinese makes verification rather difficult. On the assumption that the source does say this, and given the failure of the old USGS sources, I have searched the ANSS ("USGS") catalog for documentation, and found four more events listed. (The ISC catalogs only the first, presumably because the others are below their magnitude cut-off.) I have searched the English language seismology literature, but found no mention of this being a doublet. I did find such a mention on the web, but it did not cite a source. So verifiability is a bit iffy. ♦ J. Johnson (JJ) (talk) 01:23, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]