Talk:2012 Women's Premier Soccer League Elite season

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Women's association football portal This article is supported by the Women's football / soccer task force.

Football: American & Canadian / Season / Women's football Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American and Canadian soccer task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the season article task force.
	Women's association football portal This article is supported by the women's football task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Help with Results Table

I don't know how those "team name template" things work, could someone correct/make those? CyMoahk (talk) 19:30, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, I figured it out. =-) CyMoahk (talk) 00:34, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Top Scorers

Wouldn't it be easier for the Top Scorers section to just let how many goals the top 10 players in the league have instead of doing it game by game? It's a pain to update it the way it is set up now. Sloclops (talk) 14:51, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It'd definitely a little cumbersome, but it's a lot more complete and shows information that a simple list doesn't. I'll take care of it when I get a good amount of free time again (I've been working 11+ hrs/day for the past two weeks). CyMoahk (talk) 14:53, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

BOS-WNY ruling

WPSL has retroactively ruled the game as an 0-1 forfeit in favor of the Flash as opposed to the 3-2 Breakers victory thanks to the Breakers using an ineligible player. How do we want to handle that in terms of the game summary and all of the goals-related stats? CyMoahk (talk) 14:53, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh dang. Do you have a reference on that? I would assume that if they forfeit the game, all goals are forfeit as well. Hopefully a statement from WPSL would say something along these lines. As far as game summary goes, listing it as 0 - 1 and having a note that says original score...forfeit game...and whatever else. Sloclops (talk) 18:04, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Found a reference. Breakers Docked 3 Pts. For Ineligible Player Here's another that mentions the goal situation. Breakers blast 'travesty of justice' Definitely unfortunate for Schoepfer. Sloclops (talk) 18:11, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to updated the article to include this game. I think I correctly changed everything, but I may have missed something.Sloclops (talk) 13:47, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on 2012 Women's Premier Soccer League Elite season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:29, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on 2012 Women's Premier Soccer League Elite season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:49, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Results table order

I've changed the results table order. By all the surviving sources I can find, including the linked source for the results table (1), the Breakers finished atop of the table team even with the forfeited match. Contemporary WPSL and RS/IS media reports called them regular season champions (1, 2, 3, 4, BOS) and RS/IS reports and Flash themselves additionally confirm them finishing second (1, WNY), with the NWSL Flash media guide confirming that. The Breakers also had the top seed in the playoffs and the Flash had the second seed (1, 2), also corroborated by the Flash media guide. Retrospectives that don't rely on Wikipedia also list the Breakers either as atop the table or explicitly regular-season champions (1, 2, 3), as does the NWSL Breakers' media guide.

Is there a reason why the Breakers are listed as second on the final results table at 30 points? Was it adjusted after the season separately from the initial forfeit adjustment, and if so, is there a source for the adjustment? Are the listed tiebreakers of points/GD/goals scored correct? (WPSL tiebreakers were head-to-head first, GD between teams second, but it's unclear if they applied to WPSLE: 1). The Red Stars also forfeited a match that season but aren't docked points, is there a reason why the Breakers' total is? -Socccc (talk) 23:48, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]