Talk:2012 United States presidential election in Utah

United States: Presidential elections / Utah Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. presidential elections (assessed as Low-importance).
	Utah portal This article is supported by WikiProject Utah (assessed as Low-importance).

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

More material can be aded . . .

As the election gets closer, WP editors in Utah will no doubt want to add informative insights for Wikipedia readers. Here is something (I'm a Mormon in California). Where the Article here currently says, "In 2008, Mitt Romney received major support from the Mormon population..." it could be pointed out (with ref. of course) that "The LDS Church supports traditional family values and not specific candidates. They always have read from the pulpit their non-partisan position."

You may be interested to know that in pioneer days, to support the two-party system, Brigham Young, in general conference, said, 'Those on this half of the Tabernacle support the Republican Party, and those on the Left, support the Democrat Party." So can we count on UT editors of WP ? Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 23:58, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I made a modification to the simplistic view (just a sentence, currently) about Romney winning the 'religious vote' since currently, he is winning the 'Catholic vote' even though Santorum is Catholic. Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 00:56, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The schedule and TALK about 'pledging' delegates

FYI, I just called my brother in Utah who said he and his wife were just leaving for Caucus (Provo/Orem/BYU/Utah-Valley area). So I checked GreenPapers.com and share this here (there are three dates).
> Thursday 15 March 2012: "Neighborhood Precinct Caucuses meet to elect County and State Convention Delegates. Approximately 3,500 delegates are elected to the State Convention. There is no formal system applied in the Precinct Caucuses to relate the presidential preference to the election of State Convention delegates. The delegates in attendance at each caucus alone determine if presidential preference is to be a factor and, if so, how it is to be applied."
> Saturday 21 April 2012: "The Utah State Republican Convention convenes."
> Tuesday 26 June 2012: "[Utah's] Presidential Primary."
RE: http://www.theGreenPapers.com/P12/UT-R#0626
Hope This Helps, Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 01:29, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Four names will be on the Utah Republican ballot

Rick Santorum's name will not be on the ballot; Newt Gingrich has until April 20th to make good on the $500 filing fee (bounced).[1] So you have Mitt Romney, Ron Paul, Newt Gingrich, and who is the fourth? Is it Jon Huntsman? Just asking, Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 08:51, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Utah Republican Convention is this Saturday. My brother and his wife are attending. Will post any news I learn, plus, of course, we have the newspapers. If you are really, really interested, the Green Papers for Utah give two dozen newspapers in Utah. See 'external links' in this Article for the link to Utah Green Papers. Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 20:52, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Table of Results.

Watch the Green Papers (in the external references section) for voting and delegation formation results. Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 13:05, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article name

Please see discussion at Talk:United States presidential election, 2012#Article name, to change ", 2012" to "of 2012". Apteva (talk) 22:37, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on United States presidential election in Utah, 2012. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120218191418/http://www-cdn.npr.org/news/specials/election2008/presCounty.php?state=Utah to http://www-cdn.npr.org/news/specials/election2008/presCounty.php?state=Utah

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:52, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]