Talk:2012 United States presidential election in North Dakota

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

United States: North Dakota Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	North Dakota portal This article is supported by WikiProject North Dakota (assessed as Low-importance).

Politics

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Caucus delegate count (?)

Green Papers list the 20 for Romney as a 'soft delegate count' and for 'hard delegate count' has zero. FYI, Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 02:13, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, it's a little more complex than that. Now the ND Green Papers link (http://www.thegreenpapers.com/P12/ND-R) lists the delegate count as Paul 2, Santorum 6 & Romney 20. However, a media link (http://wtop.com/?nid=278&sid=2817738) from this talk page's Wiki article page says, "12 delegates said they backed Romney, eight supported Santorum, two favored Paul and one preferred Gingrich. Two delegates said they had no favorite.

Rounding out North Dakota's 28 delegates are three members of the Republican National Committee who will automatically attend the convention. Among them, Sandy Boehler supports Romney while Curly Haugland and Stan Stein, the state GOP chairman, are uncommitted. The delegates said they plan to meet prior to the national convention to decide how they will vote with the idea that they would divvy up votes to reflect the results of the caucuses." So, it looks like basically the "real" delegate split for ND will be Santorum with 11, Paul with 8, Romney with 7 & Gingrich with 2, which is what the main Wiki page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republican_Party_presidential_primaries,_2012) for GOP Presidential Primary says. What a mess! Guy1890 (talk) 06:01, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In this Article, the first external link explains it all (AP) [1] Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 23:13, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Here is where the names of delegates are listed: [2] but not their preferences. — Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 03:54, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article name

Please see discussion at Talk:United States presidential election, 2012#Article name, to change ", 2012" to "of 2012". Apteva (talk) 22:30, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on United States presidential election in North Dakota, 2012. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20121011025651/http://www.valleynewslive.com:80/story/19767078/poll to http://www.valleynewslive.com/story/19767078/poll

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:48, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]