Talk:2012 Summer Olympics/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
The article is pretty impressive. The article has over 75 references, a strong community updating the article 24/7, stability and a whopping 48,918 bytes. It's sister article, Bids for the 2012 Summer Olympics, is a featured article, so 2012 Summer olympics might be able to become a good article along with the bids. Secret Saturdays (talk) 01:33, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
- You haven't done any work on the article. It has cleanup tags and isn't in any shape to be passed as a GA. Until the article undergoes improvements, I'm quick-failing it. Please read the GA criteria before submitting another list for GAN. iMatthew talk at 02:57, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
- What are you talking about? I don't see any cleanup tag and it's in perfect shape. Also I heard you say I didn't do any work on here. Well, I got Histiry of the flags of Romania a good article and I didn't contribute that much on there. Secret Saturdays (talk) 04:06, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
- No, you have contributed neither to History of the flags of Romania nor its GA review process. Materialscientist (talk) 04:39, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
- It has a {{Citation needed}} and has been tagged with {{Refimprove}} since Sept 2008 (see the "Broadcasting" section). -maclean (talk) 04:27, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
- No, you have contributed neither to History of the flags of Romania nor its GA review process. Materialscientist (talk) 04:39, 3 October 2009 (UTC)