Talk:2012 Serena Williams tennis season

Tennis Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tennis, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to tennis on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TennisWikipedia:WikiProject TennisTemplate:WikiProject Tennistennis articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tennis To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Cleanup : Take an item off the Cleanup listing
Copyedit : Roger Federer, Leander Paes, Rafael Nadal, Justine Henin – to be used as examples for ideal page structures
Expand : Grab a Start article and expand it, or peruse the List of articles.
Photo : Add photos to Tennis or Tennis people articles
Stubs : Bring a Stub up to our standards.
Other : *Sign up as a member of the project.
Tag more articles with our standard project template.
Help with the creation of yearly main articles and drawsheets for every Open Era ATP and WTA tournament.

Far too detailed

IMHO this is far too detailed in it's match by match descriptions. Most events can be summarized with who they played in quarter finals and above and who won those matches. For the finals maybe a few more tidbits. Maybe a little less for smaller tournaments and a little more for the four Majors, but this article's prose could easily be cut in half. Summarize. Fyunck(click) (talk) 06:37, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to only know that actual results, there is the table All matches, the shows that. The details are for only those who wants to know what happened in the match itself. It is redundant to just say she won in straights as it is already stated in the match results. Also, the reason why separated articles were written so that there will be details. Actually not putting scores makes the articles longer than it needs to be. and

Summary-only descriptions of works. Wikipedia treats fiction in an encyclopedic manner, discussing the reception and significance of notable works in addition to a concise summary. For more information regarding plot summaries, see Wikipedia:Manual of Style (writing about fiction)#Plot summaries. Similarly, articles on works of non-fiction, including documentaries, research books and papers, religious texts, and the like, should contain more than a recap or summary of the works' contents. Such articles should be expanded to have broader coverage. As far as I am concerned this informations are non-fiction.

Dencod16 (talk) 08:04, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]