Jump to content

Talk:2012 Liberty Bowl

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good article2012 Liberty Bowl has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 23, 2013Good article nomineeListed

Team Trickle Down

[edit]

Should we be putting in any info about how NIU Getting into BCS pushed OU to Cotton etc.. and how LA Tech Declined an invite to the Independence Bowl because they thought they would be getting ISU's invite here? EnsRedShirt (talk) 01:34, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:2012 Liberty Bowl/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wizardman (talk · contribs) 04:03, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this article sometime tonight or tomorrow. Wizardman 04:03, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Here are the issues I found:

  • The Washington Post ref isn't working (http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2012-12-30/sports/36071476_1_trey-watts-alex-singleton-golden-hurricane). It's probably just archived so finding the url shouldn't be too tough, and if nothing else archive.org will have it.
  • Days of the week aren't needed in the teams section.
  • The 1972 Liberty Bowl could be linked in the Iowa State section, though I see it's currently a redlink.
  • "This will be the Golden Hurricane's second" This was the
  • "when Tulsa faced was set have a rematch with a team" huh? rm faced, add to after set.
  • Make sure the dashes (10-0) are ndashes.
  • How did ticket sales do?

I'd ask for an aftermath section, but since the draft hasn't taken place and the Iowa State linebackers are the only draft projections, it's probably not worth it to create currently. Article's on hold, will pass when fixed. Wizardman 17:32, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • All done except for the dashes...I did one section, but had a question, do all dashes need to be ndashes, or just ones in a record (e.g., is 9-play, 67-yard acceptable, or should it be 9–play, 67–yard)? Go Phightins! 19:21, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

For me the play/yard ones as is are fine, though others might disagree on that. As long as records and the like are fixed it's fine. Wizardman 00:11, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2012 Liberty Bowl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:32, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]