Talk:2012 Croydon North by-election

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Date & name

We've had this problem before... we don't yet know whether this by-election will be in 2012. It seems probable, but it could be pushed back to 2013. Bondegezou (talk) 12:35, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Safe seat vacated in September yells 2012 to me. I *know* some might consider this OR but we're not Canada or Australia, we don't keep by-elections in the air for months on end. In fact I think legislation exists to ensure that we can't have a 2013 election. In times gone by, of course, editors here (me included) would have redirected the article to the constituency one until a number of candidates were confirmed but I think those days have long gone...doktorb _words^deeds 12:52, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Mid Ulster by-election, 2012 was triggered when McGuiness resigned in mid-June and it still doesn't a have a date fixed, so presumably will be after Corby by-election, 2012 and the other two in mid-November. I.e., over 5 months later. If this by-election takes that long, it will be in 2013. Jus' sayin'! Bondegezou (talk) 19:30, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I know what you're saying, though McGuiness hasn't resigned quite yet (let's all remember the fun and games we had when Gerry Adams 'resigned'). They do things differently in Northern Ireland ;) I'm going to guess that Croydon North will be November. There's as much indication the day after his death as you'd expect so let's leave things as they are now, for now. There's always the magic redirect button of course doktorb _words^deeds 19:38, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Campaign

Don't have time right now to edit the article, but we could do with more on the campaign. Here's one article for starters: [1] Bondegezou (talk) 11:34, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Croydon North by-election, 2012. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:58, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]