Talk:2012–13 CONCACAF Champions League

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the season article task force.

Untitled

The Galaxy are currently guaranteed qualification as either the Supporter's Shield winner or the Supporter's Shield runner-up, since the Sounders are the only team that can catch them and they're already qualified. How should that be noted? --24.18.232.224 (talk) 14:28, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Seattle Sounders

Today the Seattle Sounders won 2-0 to RSL however losing 3-2 on aggregate, eliminated them from the 2011 MLS postseason so I deleted the thing that said " Seattle can still qualify for the group stage depending on the 2011 MLS postseason". Is that right and okay. This is my first post in the talk section so I am asking.--Anojan12345 (talk) 05:53, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's wrong. Seattle can still clinch a Group Stage berth if Galaxy wins the league title. Then Seattle will get USA2, which goes to the Supporters Shield winner. Seattle are Supporters Shield runners-up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.73.133.192 (talk) 02:57, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

actually that's wrwong. Seattle is already qualified as USOC winners. the next available spot goes to Real Salt Lake as the next best regular season record not already qualified for a spot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.235.114.65 (talk) 15:32, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can we have a separate section or page detailing tiebreaking procedures in case of double-qualification?

Each country has a procedure in place in case of double-qualification. Double-qualification is when a team claims more than one CCL spot. I think we should show the reader just what the rules are concerning these situations.

Also, we should add seeding explanations as well. For example, it should be noted that half-season champions with highest regular season points get the higher seed among that country's CCL entrants. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.73.133.192 (talk) 00:42, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on 2012–13 CONCACAF Champions League. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.vavel.com/lat/mx/153993-america-monterrey-y-chivas-podrian-ir-a-la-concachampions-sin-llegar-a-la-final.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:22, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]