Talk:2011 Oklahoma Sooners football team

	College football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Low‑importance

	Oklahoma portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oklahoma, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oklahoma on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OklahomaWikipedia:WikiProject OklahomaTemplate:WikiProject OklahomaOklahoma articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by OU Task-force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Ranking & Polls

In the article 2011 NCAA Division I FBS football season the AP Poll is used to rank teams. This is stated in every "standings" tables. So, my question is why is the Coaches' Poll used in the Article? Shouldn't the same poll be used in all articles? Rocketmaniac ^RT 22:00, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's for the fact that the Coaches Poll is used in calculating the BCS formula. The schedule template uses the Coaches' Poll as default, but it can be changed. However, previous articles all have the Coaches' Poll as the ranking so it should stay for consistency sake.--Crimsonedge34 (talk) 22:23, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok... Good answer. Then shouldn't we use the Coaches Poll in the main 2011 NCAA Division I FBS football season article? Rocketmaniac ^RT 22:58, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Both polls should be used in tandem. See 2005 Michigan Wolverines football team for an example. Jweiss11 (talk) 02:41, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well then. There is a lot of work to be done. I went through all top 25 (AP Poll) teams. I think there are only 2 teams that list both. Rocketmaniac ^RT 02:52, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Feel like a little project? :) Jweiss11 (talk) 04:27, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sure.... Just dont want to do a bunch of work just to have it "undone" if you know what I mean. Rocketmaniac ^RT 06:09, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing. If you run into any problems, let me know. Thanks for your efforts here. Jweiss11 (talk) 16:43, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2011 Oklahoma Sooners football team. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111123225806/http://www.soonersports.com/sports/m-footbl/stats/2011-2012/05_texas.html to http://www.soonersports.com/sports/m-footbl/stats/2011-2012/05_texas.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://newsok.com/ou-linebacker-austin-box-dies-after-being-found-unconscious/article/3569434

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:47, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]