Talk:2011 Minnesota state government shutdown

2011 Minnesota state government shutdown has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 8, 2015. (Reviewed version).

A fact from 2011 Minnesota state government shutdown appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 January 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that as much as 80 percent of government spending continued during the 2011 Minnesota state government shutdown?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2015/January. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2011 Minnesota state government shutdown.

Wikipedia

Minnesota Mid‑importance

	Minnesota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: American Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force.

Abortion bans?

I don't see anything in the referenced article that refers to abortion bans. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lauciusa (talk • contribs) 22:21, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay; found reference for the anti-abortion thing and rephrased Lauciusa (talk) 22:29, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dayton's July Offer

The state shutdown is still not over. He only gave an offer with some major conditions that the Republicans have not agreed to yet. Lets not jump the gun. Dinkytown talk 17:37, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Schools

How will this affect schools in september? 174.20.115.29 (talk) 20:47, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Twenty percent of teachers will can not teach because their licenses can not be renewed, which is normally done over the summer (i.e. now...). There's a lot more... Dinkytown talk 20:53, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:2011 Minnesota state government shutdown/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs) 13:22, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Their budget called for $34 billion in state spending, increased from $32 billion as a "compromise" with the DFL": why is "compromise" in quotes? It looks a bit like scare quotes, which is inappropriate; is it actually a quote from the given source? Is there disagreement about whether it can fairly be described as a compromise?
- The Republican leaders called it such, so I rephrased the sentence. It's implied that at least Governor Dayton disagreed with that assessment in sources. —innotata 22:43, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
What was the fate of Phyllis Kahn's continuing appropriations bill? It sounds like it probably died, but you don't say that directly.
- Yes, it died since no action was taken on it by the end of the session. I'll need to find its entry on their website (viz, a primary source) to verify this. Thanks for doing the review. —innotata 22:43, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

-- Sources and images look good. I checked for close paraphrasing and found no issues. Prose is very clean; I made a couple of minor tweaks. The above two issues are all I can see; I'll place the article on hold. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 13:49, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The question about Kahn's bill isn't worth holding up GA for, so I'm passing this. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 03:33, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]