Talk:2011 Irish presidential election/GA2

GA Review 2

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Noleander (talk · contribs) 11:13, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

IP, I see there was a prior GA review at Talk:Irish presidential election, 2011/GA1, in Dec 2011, and it failed. Can you tell me what specific changes were made to the article since then to bring it up to GA status? --Noleander (talk) 11:25, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also, it looks like you also nominated the article the first time; yet in that first GA, you did not respond to questions posted by the GA reviewer. What was the issue there? --Noleander (talk) 11:55, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to fail this. The article may meet GA criteria, but the nominator has an obligation to participate in the review process. --Noleander (talk) 21:03, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The small number of issues raised look to have been addressed so I guess this should be renominated. --86.40.207.160 (talk) 11:14, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]