Jump to content

Talk:2011 Hawthorn Football Club season

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Round 7 Summary

[edit]

Can somebody please enter a brief summary of the Round 7, Port v Hawthorn match back on May 6th. Thank you, McAusten (talk) 11:20, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Season Format

[edit]

I would like to see what people think of the foramt of our 2011 season page. Other teams have very different formats and I personally think better. I would be hasppy to update our page if people think it's worth the effort. Kreiny (talk) 03:16, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Personally, I do prefer the format for the other teams' pages. That said, they definitely aren't perfect and if you prefer this format, there's no need to change for consistency's sake. To sum up, yes, I would prefer the change, but only do it if you want to. Jenks24 (talk) 05:51, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I am the main contributor to the 2011 Carlton Football Club season article; so, naturally, that article is in the format which I think is best. (Note: I designed the Carlton page based primarily on the 2011 Geelong Football Club season). I think the format of the Hawthorn page is effective, and I think the game summaries could be useful. However, the content of the game summaries is the biggest current problem with the page: the summaries are written in the style you would see in a Hawthorn Members' magazine, which is the wrong tone for an encyclopedic article; I think the summaries need to be completely rewritten (and referenced) in a more appropriate style. Two smaller nitpicks I have are: WP:AFL advises against the use of the combinations "Richmond Tigers" and "St Kilda Saints", as well as the use of "Doggies"; and I'm not a fan of the use of gold and brown for wins and losses, although I recognise this is a matter of taste. I also went ahead and nowrapped all of the scores, which makes that column look better.Aspirex (talk) 09:04, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Please do what ever you can to improve it. After all, nobody owns it. Do your thing, and I'll have a look at it afterwards. Sp33dyphil "Ad astra" 09:46, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2011 Hawthorn Football Club season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:59, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2011_Hawthorn_Football_Club_season&oldid=1196591651"