Jump to content

Talk:2011 Gatorade Duels

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Resuls table

[edit]

An IP editor changed the table format for the two races. I find the new layout very confusing to read and would like other opinions to determine whether they should be restored back to the original, stay the same, or move to some other format. Any ideas? – Nascar1996 (talkcont) 21:09, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:2011 Gatorade Duels/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Harrias (talk · contribs) 14:45, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Lead
Background
  • "In the early years, qualifying had varying formats..." Clarify earlier that you are referring to Qualifying for the Daytona 500, not qualifying for the Gatorade Duels.
  • Start of the final paragraph: "he top 35 drivers" Missing a letter at the start.
  • "based upon their qualifying positions in the Daytona 500." But I thought these races were the qualifying for the Daytona 500? Should this say "in the previous year's Daytona 500"?
  • "Drivers who qualified in odd-number positions competed in the first Duel along with the winner of the 2012 Daytona 500 pole." This is talking about a 2011 race, so I assume talking about the 2012 Daytona 500 pole is a mistake? 2010 maybe?
  • "Positions 40 to 42 were filled with the quickest drivers who did not qualify in the top 35, apart from 43rd"... Why "apart from"? 43rd isn't including in the range 40 to 42?
  • "Two drivers outside the top 35 were eligible for two transfer spots in each Duel." I don't know what this means.
Practice and qualifying
Races

Reviewed to the end of Race 1; more to follow. Harrias talk 14:45, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Post-race
Results

@MWright96: Overall, this is a really good piece of work, and everything I have found has basically been me nit-picking. Given your quick response earlier, I won't bother putting this on hold unless you don't get to it in the next day or so, as I think we'll have this one sorted pretty quickly. Harrias talk 20:57, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]