Talk:2011 Colorado earthquake

Earthquakes Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Earthquakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of earthquakes, seismology, plate tectonics, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EarthquakesWikipedia:WikiProject EarthquakesTemplate:WikiProject EarthquakesWikiProject Earthquakes articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Colorado Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Colorado portal This article is supported by WikiProject Colorado, our collaboration to create, improve, and update Wikipedia articles about the U.S. State of Colorado. To comment about this article, select the Add topic tab above. For questions about, or to make suggestions for Colorado articles, go to our project's talk page. We invite you to join us!

Notability

This earthquakes doesn't come anyway near meeting the proposed criteria for earthquake article notability as listed here. I will be taking this to AfD unless there is a clearer claim to notability. Mikenorton (talk) 23:44, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Before heading off to AfD, I did some looking into this and I think that it should survive because it is the largest naturally occurring (i.e. not related to deep fluid disposal) earthquake for more than a hundred years in Colorado. It is also of some scientific interest due to being part of a swarm, possibly related to an earlier swarm in the same area in 2001. I will expand the article at some point to include this information. Mikenorton (talk) 18:01, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]