Jump to content

Talk:2011 Chicago mayoral election

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

R. Emmett Tyrrell

[edit]

In his column Foreign Money? Tyrrell calls his candidacy "only a satire" so I removed it as a joke. Hekerui (talk) 11:29, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

residency requirement

[edit]

No mention of this? It's making national news above the fold in re Emanuel. 72.228.177.92 (talk) 22:14, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's mentioned, at least. Hekerui (talk) 22:23, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ah yes, see it now. Will be fascinating to see how this plays out. 72.228.177.92 (talk) 22:28, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

1 party city-state?

[edit]

Is there a tacit assumption in this article that the Chicago mayoralty is a democrat party position? 72.228.177.92 (talk) 03:05, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, the election is a nonpartisan one. I've updated the article to reflect this. — Mudwater (Talk) 12:08, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, so multiple persons from the same party can be on the ballot? I don't think that's the way it worked when I lived there. Still an indicator of the party affiliation, if any, or that there was none, as there apparently isn't for most would be good. 72.228.177.92 (talk) 15:34, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
In non-partisan elections, candidates aren't listed by party affiliation, so it would be inappropriate to add it on this page. Those who have pages will list it prominently there (Emanuel, Braun, Davis, etc.). --Muboshgu (talk) 15:38, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
They are listed on the ballot in the order in which they submitted their nomination petitions (most submitted at the same time, so a lottery decided). The District of Columbia still has a system of party primaries, Chicago doesn't, so I don't think it's necessary to add party here. Hekerui (talk) 15:45, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see. It's been 30 years since I left, but Cook County Democratic Organization indicates that the short answer to thread is: y. The longer answer is yes but there is one GOP held ward and the county situation is more reflective of the normal state/national take. 72.228.177.92 (talk) 16:56, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting the manifestation of the two-party charade here. Apparently b4 the break-up of the Capone organization and construction of the current machine during the New Deal turnover, the GOP did similar service. Going back to the (civil) war, during which there was a democratic party Mayor, there was thereafter mostly GOP dominance but with a vital two-party system preceding and during the progressive era during which the parties alternated in holding the office. A number of interesting third parties such as the "Fireproof" and "Citizens" parties did during reconstruction and after the fire. 72.228.177.92 (talk) 11:46, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please use this talk page to discuss improving the article, not as a forum, per WP:FORUM. Hekerui (talk) 21:23, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hanson

[edit]

I removed Hanson from the list because he was knocked off the ballot. His court challenge is noted in the article prose and he can be readded if he is successful. Until then, he's not on the ballot. Hekerui (talk) 16:58, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chicago mayoral election, 2011. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:00, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Potential fair-use image

[edit]

Fair-use of an image from this Flickr album (containing image from the February 9 mayoral debate) might improve the article. The majority of this album's images are licensed as "Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)", permitting non-commercial fair-use. SecretName101 (talk) 21:54, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2011_Chicago_mayoral_election&oldid=1196588023"