Talk:2010 United States House of Representatives elections in Virginia

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) event(s).

Virginia Low‑importance

	Virginia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: American Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force.

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

United States: State Legislatures / Government / West Virginia Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. State Legislatures.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).
	West Virginia portal This article is supported by WikiProject West Virginia (assessed as Low-importance).

Years

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Merge 1st District election article

I suggest we merge Virginia's 1st congressional district election, 2010 into this article, as it only has a paragraph about the Republican primary. It's not expected to be a highly contested election, so I don't see why it should have its own (small) article. If things change, we can always split it out again but right now it hasn't even been updated post-primary to mention Ball is now the nominee. Flatterworld (talk) 20:09, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've done the merge, but am leaving the articles separate awaiting other input. Flatterworld (talk) 15:25, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Still no input, so I redirected the article. Flatterworld (talk) 16:42, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge 5th, 8th and 11th articles

I don't see the point in having these as separate articles. Photos can be added to this main article. The rest appears to be not much more that a repetition of the material in theis article and the district articles - minus the 'third party' candidates which is quite problematical. I've now added all the third party candidate to this article using the official Virginia government list. It's hard enough to keep these main articles updated, without having to run around and update a bunch of separate articles as well. Having an article which is incomplete in such an important area as the actual candidates isn't helpful, imo. Flatterworld (talk) 16:49, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support merge. Location (talk) 21:08, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose merge. Covering eleven elections with primary results general results, polling, and narrative description on one page would make for an overly long article. -LtNOWIS (talk) 10:42, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: The discuss link on Krystal Ball's page said this was a discussion on merging MS. Ball's article with the first district article, not merging all the districts together. 96.228.59.55 (talk) 22:01, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose merge. I opose Merging the districts together. 96.228.59.55 (talk) 22:01, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose merge Racepacket (talk) 09:39, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose merge I've included enough information to make this worthy of an it's own article. ~BLM (talk) 17:55, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose merge There is enough information in these articles to warrant separate ones. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 14:50, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Krystal Ball Article with 1st District

Support merge. Krystal Ball is no more notable than Floyd Bayne which has been merged with 7th District Race article and Rick Waugh pending deletion and Mr. Bayne at least is more notable than Waugh and Ball combined. 96.228.59.55 (talk) 21:56, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'd lean towards oppose merge. I'd say that Ball is more notable than the average "no chance of victory" House candidate, because she got some media attention for the photo controversy. Much of that coverage was more about female candidates and social media than about the election itself. -LtNOWIS (talk) 07:39, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- In other words, I'd say she meets WP:POLITICIAN under the third criteria, because the coverage of her controversial photos was essentially independent of her race to unseat Wittman. -LtNOWIS (talk) 17:47, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, as above. Quite notable. Jack Merridew 00:28, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Racepacket (talk) 22:19, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on United States House of Representatives elections in Virginia, 2010. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100522143504/http://www.lightforcongress.com/index.php?id=3 to http://www.lightforcongress.com/index.php?id=3

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:21, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]