Talk:2010 United States House of Representatives elections in Pennsylvania

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

Pennsylvania's 7th congressional district election, 2010

Unless things suddenly change, I don't see any reason to have Pennsylvania's 7th congressional district election, 2010 as a separate article. The only thing missing is the debate schedule, I think. Flatterworld (talk) 02:30, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's a toss up election for an open seat. In additon, both candidates have pictures and they both raised a lot of money, making this district one of the most expensive the year.--Jerzeykydd (talk) 02:44, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I vote to keep this stand-alone article. This article has far more detail than the all-Pennsylvania article and, thus, is more useful to the public at large and voters in particular. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hoosierhistorian (talk • contribs) 16:28, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge -- but (with all of the 2010 elections) tag {Recentism}/WP:RECENTISM. --S. Rich (talk) 16:08, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I think it's worth keeping, although I'd like to see it expanded with more detail and further improved. In fact, I think individual articles about House races even more obscure than this would be fine, as long as they are strong articles that offer more than the brief District # descriptions at the general 2010 elections page. — Hun ter Ka hn 03:05, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not sure why this has been tagged with WP:RECENTISM. As an article referring to an election that hasn't even happened yet it's unclear to me how the events that it describes could be anything but 'recent'. Blakkandekka (talk) 11:06, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on United States House of Representatives elections in Pennsylvania, 2010. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100523101229/http://www.foxnews.com:80/interactive/politics/2010/05/18/pennsylvania-governor-senate-house/ to http://www.foxnews.com/interactive/politics/2010/05/18/pennsylvania-governor-senate-house/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:24, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]