Talk:2010 Melbourne live music rally

Australia: Melbourne / Music Low‑importance

	Australia portal 2010 Melbourne live music rally is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Melbourne (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian music (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Help!

We need the full list of speakers, aerial images, reference checking and research. Ground images will be up shortly. If you know something that's not here, add it! Nick carson (talk) 11:12, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

POV

The article is pretty one-sided at the moment: further editing for WP:NPOV is needed, along with the references mentioned above. There's also a fair bit of what looks like Original research in there: what's not WP:Verifiable should be removed. Thanks, MuffledThud (talk) 06:17, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your observations. Some edits have been made to correct particular instances of NPOV and general one-sidedness. Original research will likely form a key part of future WP policy and it's current status in existing WP policy is disputed and the need for amendments has been discussed. I shall add references in compliance with WP:V to verify my original research at a date in the near future when I am able to have further access to the internet, unless another editor can do so in the meantime.

In the meantime, existing information in this article that remains unreferenced as per WP policy has been thoroughly researched and compared against independent sources and direct observation, and as such, should be maintained until such time as adequate referencing in accordance with WP policy can be implemented. Nick carson (talk) 13:07, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I'm quite happy to leave the unreferenced stuff in place for now, as you're obviously hard at work editing it. Thanks for all the work you've put in on this so far. MuffledThud (talk) 14:30, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]