Jump to content

Talk:2010 Indianapolis 500

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contact

[edit]

I assume it's simply because of what the official results say, but Ana Beatriz didn't contact anything. She spun all on her own and never touched a wall. I'd also argue that contact is misleading for Conway and Hunter-Reay, they collided. The359 (Talk) 18:03, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you're referring to the terms in the "Race Results" table, yes, that's taken from the official results, where "contact" has the technical meaning of any collision, no matter how minor or how serious. As for Beatriz, user BleuDXXXIV added into the "race summary" a sentence saying that Beatriz spun into the inside wall while attempting to avoid the Conway/Hunter-Reay crash. I'll check the broadcast or see if I can find another source to verify that when I get a chance. Chuck (talk) 20:35, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I just checked the broadcast, and yes, you can see Beatriz spin and hit the inside wall during the Conway/Hunter-Reay crash. You can also see it at [1] - the initial broadcast shows a wider angle than most of the replays, and at 0:19 you can see Beatriz spin and hit the wall, albeit fairly gently. Chuck (talk) 01:47, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Even if the official report uses contact for any sort of accident, its not in the best interest of an encyclopedia for a common user to use the same term for all these types of incidents, in my opinion.The359 (Talk) 04:22, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I think the text race summary section (where it's currently described as "a dramatic crash...flipping Conway's car and sending it airborne and into the protective fence, shattering the car") is a better place than the tabular race results for that kind of nuance. In any case, what would you suggest as an alternative which would be suitably short enough for tabular presentation? None of "accident" "collision" or "crash" necessarily imply a multi-car event, and trying to come up with a classification for the severity of contact risks running into OR issues, unless there's some external reliable source which already makes such a classification. Chuck (talk) 04:36, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How to present qualifying points?

[edit]

Since league points were awarded for all qualifying positions (not just the pole) for the 500, should that be represented somewhere, and if so, how? Just added into the "Points" column on the "Race Results" table? In the tables in the "Qualifying" section, or perhaps the "Starting Grid?" (Anyone know if the qualifying points would be affected due to starting order changes after qualifying? It's not so much relevant for this particular race since the only change was to switch positions 32 and 33, which earn the same points for qualifying. But, say, if the car qualified in the 10th position had to move to 33rd due to car or driver changes, would the driver still get points for qualifying 10th? That might inform whether "Qualifying" or "Starting Grid" would be the better place to display those points.) Chuck (talk) 15:07, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on 2010 Indianapolis 500. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:27, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on 2010 Indianapolis 500. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:45, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2010_Indianapolis_500&oldid=1196568203"