Talk:2010 Canadian Championship

Canada: Sport Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian sport.

Football: American & Canadian / Season Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American and Canadian soccer task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the season article task force.

kit?

Looking at past results and those of other national league championships, the kit isn't usually included on those pages. Is there a better place to store that information? Perhaps a different template that included kit? --Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:27, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Collapsible box?

What's the point of the collapsible box, when it doesn't actually collapse? (TopDogg79 (talk) 05:10, 6 May 2010 (UTC))[reply]

It does collapse. The team doesn't though because it's not suppose to be part of the template. It's a different template altogether. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:16, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It looks silly combining the two, don't you think? The collapsible box only contains a tiny bit of info, whereas the template that doesn't collapse has far more. (TopDogg79 (talk) 05:24, 6 May 2010 (UTC))[reply]

It does and Football line-up shouldn't be in there. It's not standard. It could be in a Match line-ups section, but not part of the match reports. Look at other tournament formats. For correct use (we're not using it correctly) see template:Football line-up. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:28, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For instance 2009–10 UEFA Champions League and 2010 FIFA World Cup qualification and the main articles under that. They don't use collapse, and they definitely don't use Football line-up. Not sure where Football line-up should be used. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:49, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Solved. An anonymous editor didn't know that there had been a goal correction and updated the article, putting a lot of effort (and multiple edits) into it. I undid it and someone reverted, also because they didn't know. Finally the editor noticed that it was rolled-up and removed the collapse and as so I decided to remove the collapse on all the other boxes. So what's the point of the lineup? --Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:34, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And see 2010 Stanley Cup playoffs for an example of where collapsible boxes are displayed. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:00, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good work. This is much more streamlined. TopDogg79 (talk) 03:42, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's your idea of streamlined that prevails in the aerodynamic world of Detroit. It now looks bulky, awkward, and unlike any other competition page for any other sport. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:30, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Horizontal lines to separate the matches?

If we didn't have the line-ups, we wouldn't need to have the horizontal lines. Are they really needed? --Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:06, 6 May 2010 (UTC) ~~: I see that this page has been intercepted by a bot.:~~ [reply]

(kepttheparagraphbarschangedthecomma))Please note you also undid the bars in between games. Anymore conflict between hugo1009, 99.236.64.223 and Walter Görlitz will lead to bans or the locking of page --Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:30, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]