Talk:2010 Brazilian Grand Prix/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Bcschneider53 (talk · contribs) 17:14, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take this one. Comments to follow soon. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 17:14, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): {{GAList/check|}y}
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

"Jenson Button, Hamilton's teammate, was mathematically eliminated from retaining the championship" Suggest making it more clear that Button was the defending champion

"with 231 points; ahead of Red Bull's Mark Webber" think a comma is more appropriate here, or perhaps even nothing at all

ALT text for images might be good if you have FAC aspirations, but not a requirement here by any means.
"Schumacher fell to tenth by driving onto the grass" was this a driver's error or was he forced onto the grass?
"the Grand Prix's sole safety car deployment:" I'd change this to a simple period but feel free to ignore this one if you like it as is.

Just a note, I've boldly tweaked the captions to ensure the parentheses are non-italics, feel free to tweak further

Really just some minor prose stuff here. Should be simple fixes. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 16:21, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]