Talk:2010–11 UEFA Women's Champions League

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Women's association football portal This article is supported by the Women's football / soccer task force.

Football: Season / Women's football Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the season article task force.
	Women's association football portal This article is supported by the women's football task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

The leagues:

Azerbaijan seems to have no current league. Any info about Macedonia and Georgia? I can't find sites of the league or sources. Do they send cup winners? -Koppapa (talk) 07:52, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FYR Macedonia had a league in 2003 and the facebook page of the 2009 seems to indicate it's still going ()Facebook page, if you quote their info and put it through google translate from Serbian it says they've been participating in the 'Prvata Makedonska fudbalska liga' for eight years. And the Macedonian FA (Excel file) have published a spreadsheet with a 21-game league calendar. (due to end on 27 June)

As for Georgia, the letter system makes it pretty difficult to google anything. Sam Vimes 13:38, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, the entry list is out: In Kazakhstan it lists CSHVSM and not

Sdyushor-2 see here That's another club, right? Also in Belarus Zorka is listed, although

Universitet Vitebsk see here is the champion? ANyone got info on that? -Koppapa (talk) 09:14, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea about CSHVSM, but what's weird is it seems to be an abbreviation that could be used for the Ukrainian club (Chernihiv SHVSM...) I guess UEFA will correct it if they're wrong. Sam Vimes 12:41, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Strangely in 2007 Zorka BDU was champion, but Universitet Vitebsk competed in the UEFA Women's cup. -Koppapa (talk) 09:58, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

zorka bdu

It seems, zorka bdu is the women's section of this team: FC Zvezda-BGU Minsk. [See http://www.bigsoccer.com/clubs/europe-uefa/belarus/1.-division/zvezda-bgu-minsk/ 1], 2, 3. -Koppapa (talk) 08:42, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2010–11 UEFA Women's Champions League. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101112183826/http://sport.today.kz/ru/news/football/2010-09-22/Duysburg to http://sport.today.kz/ru/news/football/2010-09-22/Duysburg

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:43, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]