Jump to content

Talk:2010–11 Football League Cup

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Including League Abbreviation in the table

[edit]

Any thoughts on including the club's current league in each round's table? Here's an example of what the first round north table would look like:

North
Tie no Home team Score1 Away team Attendance
1 L1 Hartlepool United 2–0 Sheffield United CH 2,520
2 CH Leicester City 4–3 Macclesfield Town L2 6,142
3 L1 Walsall 0–1 Tranmere Rovers L1 2,253
4 L1 Carlisle United 0–1 Huddersfield Town L1 3,475
5 L2 Stockport County 0–5 Preston North End CH 3,724
6 CH Barnsley 0–1 Rochdale L1 4,107
7 L2 Morecambe 2–0 Coventry City CH 4,002
8 CH Doncaster Rovers 1–1 Accrington Stanley L2 4,603
Accrington Stanley won 2–1 after extra time
9 L2 Chesterfield 1–2 Middlesbrough CH 6,509
10 L1 Peterborough United 4–1 Rotherham United L2 4,145
11 L2 Bradford City 1–1 Nottingham Forest CH 5,175
Bradford City won 2–1 after extra time
12 CH Leeds United 4–0 Lincoln City L2 12,602
13 L1 Sheffield Wednesday 1–0 Bury L2 7,390
14 CH Scunthorpe United 2–1 Oldham Athletic L1 2,602
15 L2 Crewe Alexandra 1–0 Derby County CH 3,778

On the one hand it's a little more cluttered. On the other, it's more informative. Readers often want to see what the big upsets are and which lower division teams still remain. Simianvector (talk) 07:38, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it clutters it that much, and it is a lot easier than me previewing a club's article if I'm not sure what league they're in. - Chrism would like to hear from you 15:16, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Despite disagreeing with the reversion, I'm a little halfhearted on re-adding it, just because I still think it looked cluttered. What are the thoughts on using color rather than text to indicate current league? I'm going to add a note to the Football League Cup talk page as well, since it's a topic of interest beyond just this season. Simianvector (talk) 00:10, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Extra time scores

[edit]

It's misleading to report the score after 90 minutes when there were goals in extra time - in most places (e.g. http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/league_cup/results/default.stm ), the result is given as it was after 120 minutes.

Instead of: "Doncaster Rovers 1-1 Accrington Stanley (Accrington Stanley won 2-1 after extra time)"

You should put: "Doncaster Rovers 1-2 Accrington Stanley (After extra time; 1-1 after 90 minutes)"

Otherwise, people skimming through for the result might think that the game finished 1-1.

The talk page for last season implies that the result is listed after 90 minutes because that's how the FA does it. http://www.thefa.com/TheFACup/FACompetitions/TheFACup/History/CupFinalResults implies otherwise - for example, the 1993 cup final replay. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.73.146.106 (talk) 16:54, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

The image File:Carling Cup logo 2009-10.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --04:03, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2010–11 Football League Cup. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:05, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2010–11_Football_League_Cup&oldid=1196581236"