Talk:2009 World Series of Poker

Gambling: Poker Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gambling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gambling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GamblingWikipedia:WikiProject GamblingTemplate:WikiProject GamblingGambling articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Poker (assessed as Mid-importance).

WikiProject Gambling To-do:

Current collaborations:

Improve an article to FA

Improve an article to A

Help with the Gambling articles needing attention.
Tag the talk pages of Gambling-related articles with the {{WikiProject Gambling}} banner.
The link to the Missouri gambling site is now out of date and needs to be updated.
Japan section reads as though it was written by the gambling industry - quotes of 160% returns are 'citation needed'.

Image copyright problem with File:World Series of Poker logo.png

The image File:World Series of Poker logo.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --06:00, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The image should not be re-added. The image does not improve the reader's understanding of this article one bit; if they really want to see the logo, then they can click through to the WSOP article. Gary King (talk) 19:05, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actions of SDNY

I think the actions of the SDNY should be listed as this did effect poker players planning on coming to the WSOP. One of the people interviewed by ABC explicitly received money he won from PS to play in the Main Event, but was unable to access it because of the crack down. I think this makes it meaningful. I also, think we need to be expanding the lead of this article. Just having the winners isn't enough. We need to start telling the story of the 2009 WSOP. What happened?---Balloonman ^{NO! I'm Spartacus!} 21:46, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Amarillo Slim???

Is Amarillo not competing in the Main Event this year? I thought it was going to? If not, why?---Balloonman ^{NO! I'm Spartacus!} 13:51, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

- He is. He compited in day 1-b. Cardplayer.com has some info. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.15.149.189 (talk) 19:27, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template

I have created {{2009 World Series of Poker}}. I am trying to determine if enough of these articles exist for this to be a useful template. Please comment at Template talk:2009 World Series of Poker#Is this useful.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 02:54, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on 2009 World Series of Poker. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100130050146/http://www.pokernews.com:80/live-reporting/wsop-2009-final-table/november-nine/day1/page38.htm to http://www.pokernews.com/live-reporting/wsop-2009-final-table/november-nine/day1/page38.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:54, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]