Talk:2009 North Korean parliamentary election
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2009 North Korean parliamentary election article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
A news item involving 2009 North Korean parliamentary election was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 8 March 2009. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is about a topic whose name is originally rendered in the Korean script; however the article does not have that version of its name in the article's lead paragraph. Anyone who is knowledgeable enough with the original language is invited to assist in adding the Korean script. For more information, see: MOS:FOREIGN · Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Korean). |
Untitled
[edit]This is not news, at all.Drchazz (talk) 04:52, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
North Korea and elections? This must be som kind of a joke...--Oddeivind (talk) 16:35, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
- Nope. The article Politics of North Korea explains it. Aridd (talk) 10:18, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
- I hope the opposition wins, oh nevermind...Etherialemperor (talk) 05:12, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
Are we sure that the elections were held on August 5? There's no mention of them in KCNA, or anywhere else that I can find. Aridd (talk) 13:39, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
- I can't find any info either. The quoted source says the elections have been held, but it is unreliable (e.g. Somaliland presidential election has definately not been held). Brambo (talk) 14:13, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
- The CIA website confirms that elections were due in August 2008, but doesn't say they actually took place. I'm going to do what I did for the French version of this article: edit it to indicate that elections were due to be held, but that no information is available as to whether they occured. Aridd (talk) 07:19, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
Would it be biased...
[edit]...to openly state these are show elections? 76.117.247.55 (talk) 20:58, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
- I think they should be called show elections. With a reference in the form of a proper inline citation of course. Tempshill (talk) 22:38, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
- I have complained about this on T:MP as well. There are a lot of countries in the world where the right to vote has been hard-won, where it has involved at least two parties vying for the public imprimatur. To call an event where the population is required to rubber-stamp 687 names into a rubber-stamp national legislative body an election is an insult to so many people, not least those who got beaten and harassed by Mugabe's thugs in Zimbabwe. Daniel Case (talk) 04:54, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- Well, you sound objective. --128.243.253.111 (talk) 16:15, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- I think the nature of the election is already quite clear from the article text. I don't think we need to editorialise. It is theoretically possible for the voters to reject all candidates, but I don't think it has ever happened. Is it clear from which box the vote goes into, which way someone has voted? Otherwise we could quote someone notable who has commented if we have a reference. Perhaps balanced with a victory quote from Mr Kim... Xandar 16:19, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- I agree. I would also note that many sources, even those which call the body a rubber stamp parliament don't call it a show election, simply a parliamentary election or election and mention voting not show voting Nil Einne (talk) 12:32, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
- All bias aside, as a simple and ignorant question, could someone provide an explanation of why they bother? It sounds like a whole lot of trouble to go through for no apparent reason (aside from the defector tracking described in the article, but if that is actually the motivation to have the entire 'election' this needs to be made clearer, and if not it shouldn't be implied - it seems hard for me to picture that a police state like North Korea can only figure out who has disappeared when they hold an election). Wnt (talk) 10:10, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- From show election, essentially it's for propaganda purposes so they can publicly claim they have a "freely elected representative government". How many people that actually takes in I don't know.
- To get back to the question, I'm curious why many news sources would call it a rubber stamp (Which it is, in the worst way) but not call it a show election, since it meets that criteria as much as its result being a rubber stamp. 76.117.247.55 (talk) 01:10, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- I say keep it. I find the tone of this article to be utterly amusing. Seriously though, I think the facts all point to it being a show election. You don't need an article somewhere actually calling it a show election or a rubber-stamp parliament. That's like waiting for an official study to prove that drinking beer makes you drunk. FallenMorgan (talk) 03:59, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
Deputies
[edit]I don't suppose there is a list published of the deputies elected, or an electoral district map anywhere out there? --70.75.214.19 (talk) 03:14, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
impending launch of a satellite into orbit
[edit]I wonder if http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090309/ap_on_re_as/as_koreas_tension is tied in. Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 06:54, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on North Korean parliamentary election, 2009. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160122113124/http://www.ipu.org/parline-e/reports/arc/2085_09.htm to http://www.ipu.org/parline-e/reports/arc/2085_09.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090313024939/http://www.korea-dpr.com:80/cgi-bin/simpleforum.cgi?fid=02&topic_id=1236661702 to http://www.korea-dpr.com/cgi-bin/simpleforum.cgi?fid=02&topic_id=1236661702
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:14, 13 January 2017 (UTC)