Jump to content

Talk:2009 North Dakota floods

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Scope of article

[edit]

Several editors added information on other North Dakota floods to the 2009 Red River flood page. There was also a rename. These changes were reverted.

I suggested this on the talk page for that article:

I understand the desire to add the information on the flooding of the Missouri and its tributaries. There are of course some features in common: heavy precipitation (especially snow) on frozen ground, ice dams blocking watercourses. One possible solution would be to take the redirect you created, 2009 North Dakota Flood and address the Missouri basin flooding there and also have a summary of the Red River flooding, with a
Main article: 2009 Red River Flood
template to this more detailed and, in geographic scope, broader article. Kablammo (talk) 22:04, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Then this article was created, and the other article was turned into a redirect here (also reverted). I posted this message to that editor:

Hello. I think you are trying, in good faith, to follow the suggestion I made here that you add the other North Dakota floods to a separate article. Some suggestions:
  • Do not simply copy the material from 2009 Red River flood to the new article. There are reasons why that should not be done. Article history, including authorship, has to be kept intact; you should not cut-and-paste material from one article to another. Instead, write a summary, in your own words, for the new article, and leave the Red River article as is.
  • Another reason to leave the Red River flood article as is, is because there is also flooding in Minnesota and Manitoba.
Thanks. Kablammo (talk) 19:49, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

We should allow this article to be developed. To do so the copy-and-pasted content here on the Red River flood should be rewritten, and this article should be limited to the scope of its title (which likely should be changed to 2009 North Dakota floods). Information on the Red River flooding should be left to the general article on that flood. There will of course be an overlap, but there is nothing wrong with that. Kablammo (talk) 00:38, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have deleted the materials which are out of scope, reorganized some material, and added a background section. Additional text and cites should probably be added on the Missouri basin flooding; the Souris River flooding section needs text; and as mentioned above, the Red River flooding should be rewritten and also condensed (there is a lot of "old news" there; we already have a separate article on the Red River floods; and I understand for GFDL reasons we should not reuse text w/o its history). Good luck. (I'm done here.) Kablammo (talk) 01:18, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on 2009 North Dakota floods. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:18, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2009 North Dakota floods. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:36, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on 2009 North Dakota floods. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:13, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2009_North_Dakota_floods&oldid=1196548191"