Talk:2009 Nobel Prize
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Annual articles a good idea?
[edit]I'm not entirely sure that it is relevant to have annual articles, in addition to the articles on the respective prizes and the various overview articles. Any thoughts? Tomas e (talk) 15:03, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
- I concur. I initially tagged this page for a CSD A11 as it pretty much recreates the content available on List of Nobel Laureates but I'd like other opinions.--Falcon8765 (talk) 23:09, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
- Well, the only thing that I see that this type of article (or rather, 100+ articles in a series of this type) could really add, would be specific information on that year's award ceremonies. However, I see no such information currently. I suggest to give the discussion a week or so, and if no substantial support emerges in that time, redirect it to the main Nobel Prize article rather than deleting it via an "admin route". Tomas e (talk) 09:32, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
- There is also a discussion of this article here: [1]
- Well, the only thing that I see that this type of article (or rather, 100+ articles in a series of this type) could really add, would be specific information on that year's award ceremonies. However, I see no such information currently. I suggest to give the discussion a week or so, and if no substantial support emerges in that time, redirect it to the main Nobel Prize article rather than deleting it via an "admin route". Tomas e (talk) 09:32, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
There is the reason to why it was created. --Esuzu 18:05, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
I redirected it; there's no real point to having annual articles when List of Nobel laureates exists. — sephiroth bcr (converse) 07:50, 28 January 2010 (UTC)