Jump to content

Talk:2009 NBA All-Star Game

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good article2009 NBA All-Star Game has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 3, 2009Good article nomineeListed

Starbury '09

[edit]

This is a massive online initiative. This initiative is listed on numerous websites including the ones below, why can we not list this information on Wikipedia? Let's have a discussion.

RealGM, Knicksonline, DraftExpress, IGN, Hoops Vibe, NYPost, NYMag, NYDaily News. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.156.133.63 (talk) 07:05, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


RVV to last by russbot

[edit]

Sorry that I didn't explain this in more detail in the edit summary.

There has been multiple valdalism on this page, so I reverted back to a version of the page from 12 OCT 2006. This has not been decided, at best, there is speculation regarding at least Toronto and Phoenix. At other places on Wikipedia, it is claimed to be gospel fact that Milwaukee will be hosting the 2009 All-star game, but I find that dubious, since I cannot find a supporting reference.

Roodog2k 20:33, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


The claim that the game will be held in Milwaukee is completely false. (It may but nothing has been decided.) I do not think that this article should exist, let alone be linked, especially since the link does not contain the information in the statement.

Swimsuit Special

[edit]

After the Rookie/Sophmore game The SI Swimsuit Issue 2009 special will air at 11:30pm easren time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cooly123 (talkcontribs) 16:06, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The winner of the dunk contest...

[edit]

...was Nate Robinson, not Dwight Howard. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.8.77.104 (talk) 04:20, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I already changed it just when you posted that. -- Luke4545 (talk) 04:22, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:2009 NBA All-Star Game/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Planning to review article shortly, stand by. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 01:09, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Preliminary criteria

[edit]

See here for the 'quick-fail' criteria.

  1. The article completely lacks reliable sources.
    Good No problems here.
  2. The topic is treated in an obviously non-neutral way.
    Good No obvious problems here.
  3. There are still valid cleanup banners.
    Good No problems here.
  4. The article is or has been the subject of ongoing or recent, unresolved edit wars.
    Good No problems here.
  5. The article specifically concerns a rapidly unfolding current event with a definite endpoint.
    Good No problems here.
  6. Overall
    Good Article easily passes the preliminary criteria. Will review for the good article criteria soon. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 14:26, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good article criteria

[edit]

See here for good article criteria.

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    A. (prose): Good Most grammar issues fixed here (diff).
    B. (MoS): Good No apparent issues, formatting is consistent.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    A. (references): Good References are numerous as well as reliable.
    B. (citations to reliable sources): Good No problems here.
    C. (no original research): Good No problems here.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    A. (major aspects): Good Main topics are all addressed.
    B. (focused): Good/Neutral Decent: small amount of unnecessary detail exists in descriptions of the All-Star Weekend Contest rules.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias: Good No problems here.
    No noticeable slants exist towards any contestants.
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.: Good No problems here.
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    A. (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): Good All images check out.
    B. (appropriate use with suitable captions): Good Captions are informative.
    More photos of the actual event (rather than just the players) would be ideal, but isn't absolutely necessary.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: Good Pass: article meets or exceeds all of the good article criteria. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 15:14, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on 2009 NBA All-Star Game. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:00, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on 2009 NBA All-Star Game. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:53, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]