Talk:2009 Houston elections
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Untitled
[edit]Where is the discussion about candidates' backgrounds and political affiliation?
I saw a notation that said the consensus was to list political offices held. I take that to mean elected office. But don't incumbents get enough of an advantage already?
It seems the accurate, unbiased, 'encyclopaedic' policy would be to either let every candidate have a mention of his/her "background" or allow no one to do that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Statmaster (talk • contribs) 01:15, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Houston elections, 2009. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091007102414/http://www.harrisvotes.org/Sample_b/SampleBallot_ENG.pdf to http://harrisvotes.org/Sample_b/SampleBallot_ENG.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20010718174913/http://www.jolandajones.com/ to http://www.jolandajones.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:58, 7 November 2017 (UTC)