Jump to content

Talk:2009 Football League One play-off final

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good article2009 Football League One play-off final has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 1, 2021Good article nomineeListed
September 19, 2021Good topic candidatePromoted
January 24, 2024Good topic removal candidateDemoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 11, 2021.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that 23-year-old Michael Oliver refereed the 2009 Football League One play-off Final at Wembley Stadium the day after his father had officiated the 2009 Football League Two play-off Final?
Current status: Good article

Refereeing relatives

[edit]

Times The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 21:56, 6 February 2021 (UTC)  Done[reply]

Sources

[edit]

Background

[edit]

Play-offs

[edit]

Pre-match

[edit]

Match

[edit]

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Valereee (talk20:23, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Oliver
Michael Oliver

5x expanded by The Rambling Man (talk). Self-nominated at 19:39, 7 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:2009 Football League One play-off Final/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 08:41, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Going to review this for the GAN March 2021 Backlog Drive. MWright96 (talk) 08:41, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Lead

[edit]

Route to the final

[edit]

Background

[edit]

Summary

[edit]

Post-match

[edit]

Am placing the review on hold to allow the nominator to address or query the points raised above. MWright96 (talk) 17:22, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MWright96 all done and/or responded to above. Many thanks for your review, both here and the other GANs you've done for me. Cheers. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 18:17, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@The Rambling Man: Now promoting to GA class MWright96 (talk) 18:48, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]