Talk:2009 Chinese Grand Prix
 | A fact from 2009 Chinese Grand Prix appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 April 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
No Austrian anthem for winning constructor?
[edit]How come the British anthem was played for Red Bull when they are de jure an Austrian team? Is it because they are a de facto British team or just an FIA mistake? --SirJibby (talk) 18:37, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
- You might be interested in discussions already underway: Talk:2009 Formula One season#Red Bull nationality and Talk:Red Bull Racing#Austrian Nationality. LeaveSleaves 18:40, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
- The short answer being that it was a mistake. 4u1e (talk) 21:08, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
The format
[edit]This is the second time I'm reverting the prevalent format used for the race articles and I feel I should start this discussion instead of just reverting it. The common format nests "Background" within the "Report" section. While I never quite understood what "Report" signifies, I'm assuming it means report of the racing weekend i.e events taking place on Friday, Saturday and Sunday, the racing day. If this is correct, then why is "Background" included into this? Almost everything in the background section occurs long before Friday and hence isn't really part of the report of the event. I think we should keep the "Background" section separate from what I've named in the article as "Event report" since they are really not integral in terms of the information included in them. LeaveSleaves 21:10, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- I've started a discussion at WT:F1 here. D.M.N. (talk) 21:16, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on 2009 Chinese Grand Prix. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090417005806/http://www.fia.com/en-GB/mediacentre/pressreleases/f1releases/2009/Pages/f1_preview_chn.aspx to http://www.fia.com/en-GB/mediacentre/pressreleases/f1releases/2009/Pages/f1_preview_chn.aspx
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.skysports.com/story/0%2C19528%2C12433_5194919%2C00.html
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.crash.net/Formula%2BOne/News/145465/1/bourdais_returns_str_to_top_ten_in_shanghai.html
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.skysports.com/story/0%2C19528%2C12433_5198452%2C00.html
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.crash.net/Formula%2BOne/News/145482/1/glock_to_suffer_grid_penalty.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:39, 18 June 2017 (UTC)