Talk:2009 British Columbia electoral reform referendum

A fact from 2009 British Columbia electoral reform referendum appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 March 2008, and was viewed approximately 517 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that British Columbians will get a second chance to vote on replacing the winner-takes-all election system with a single-transferrable vote system?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2008/March.

Wikipedia

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Canada: British Columbia / Governments Mid‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Governments of Canada.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Results Box

Does anyone know how to do a proper results box matching the one for the Wikipedia page on the Ontario referendum? The current one is incomplete. --Reallavergne (talk) 17:58, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Question

In my view, the following material does not belong in the "Question section" and strikes me as a little too editorial in character for an encyclopedia. I have removed it. cit "BC-STV would offer a much more proportional representation but would complexify the administration of elections. The proposal was to keep using paper ballots, which would contain more information. Converting the paper votes to results would have been longer and required more human resources." endcit. One could have a section in which we would cite the main arguments made by both opponents and supporters of STV, but that would have to be a separate section and much more complete. --Reallavergne (talk) 18:03, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Analysis

This page sorely needs well-sourced opinion and analysis for the reasons for the massive drop-off in support from the earlier referendum. ‒ Jaymax✍ 06:32, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Canada, and North America for that matter, not just BC, needs proportional representation. Only then will your vote truly count, because in a first-past-the-post system, if you do not vote for the winning person, your vote counts for NOTHING. Just like in the USA for that matter. In the case of BC's attempt to change the voting system, KEEP IT SIMPLE. Forget the multiple candidates thing. Just vote for a certain political party, and they will have their lists of candidates to fill the jobs. That way, you will get competent and experienced people in parliament also.Egarthe (talk) 03:26, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I totally agree with you Jaymax. I have already added some analysis of this sort for the Wikipedia page on the Ontario Referendum, so let's see what I can do for this one. Your question is fundamental. Will four referendums in a row having failed in Canada, we need to understand why and how this happened. Denis Pilon wrote a great article in 2010 that I will use as a primary source to write something up. We can add other references later as required. --Reallavergne (talk) 17:58, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on British Columbia electoral reform referendum, 2009. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080705083158/http://www.stv.ca:80/ to http://stv.ca
Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080927055845/http://www.bc-stv.ca:80/ to http://www.bc-stv.ca

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:45, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on British Columbia electoral reform referendum, 2009. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090419164355/http://stv.ca:80/node/810 to http://stv.ca/node/810

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:10, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on British Columbia electoral reform referendum, 2009. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:26, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]