Talk:2009 Alabama Crimson Tide football team/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 15:10, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found.

Linkrot: two found and tagged.[1] Jezhotwells (talk) 15:18, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
according various publications. various is a weasel word here, also missing preposition. Done
Statement reworded and "various" removed. Patriarca12 (talk) 17:58, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
~~There are a large number of cites to http://www.al.com/blogs/ Blogs are not a [[WP:RS|reliable source.~~ Done

~~Two dead links refs #166 & #199~~ Done

Otherwise references check, assume good faith for off-line sources.
All of the http://www.al.com/blogs/ have been removed as each one that was used was a secondary source citation. The two dead links have alos been fixed. Patriarca12 (talk) 17:58, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Thorough coverage of the subject
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Captioned and tagged.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
On Hold for seven days for issues above to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 16:38, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, that does the trick. I am happy to list. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 18:51, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking the time for the review! I believe I have made all of the requested changes, but please feel free to let me know if anything else needs to be done. Thanks again! Patriarca12 (talk) 17:58, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]