Talk:2009–10 UEFA Europa League qualifying phase and play-off round

This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past.

This article was nominated for deletion on 23 June 2009. The result of the discussion was keep.

Contest prod

Given that we have this, this, this, this, I don't see why this article should be deleted. Chanheigeorge (talk) 16:05, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree to keep this article, but I'd like to remark that you gave examples of Champions League qualifiers and subsequently can't be used as arguments for the Europa League. Rhand007 (talk) 19:31, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dinaburg-Kalju 1st leg 1st round game

Somebody keeps changing 1st round 1st leg game's stadium - it is not Celtnieks Stadium, but Daugava Stadium. It is not the same stadium. And the fact that Daugava Stadium doesn't have it's own wiki article doesn't change that. Here at UEFA official page you can see "Daugava". And see this poster. At Latvian Football Federation oficial page you can see, that "Dinaburg" is playing at two home stadiums - "Daugava" and "Celtnieks".- Mrom (talk) 15:08, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal

I propose that UEFA Europa League 2009–10 qualifying phase and UEFA Europa League 2009–10 play-off round be merged. Although UEFA regulations technically treat these stages as separate, neither stage constitutes the "competition proper", which only begins at the group stage. This is especially noted when tallying the top goalscorers in the competition, for which only goals scored from the group stage onwards are counted. Furthermore, I see no point in creating an individual article for a single round of the competition. The only round that should have its own article is the final, and that is because it is a notable match on its own merits. – Pee Jay 13:26, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AA Gent - AS Roma

According to both clubsites the order of the games is switched. So AS Roma will play at home on 30 July, and at 6 August they'll play in Gent (Italian source & Belgian source), the UEFA website didn't change it yet though so I have no idea if we have to wait until they change it before we can adjust it as well. Any thoughts on this? Rhand007 (talk) 15:10, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bug

Page look bad at the end —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.172.180.149 (talk) 16:44, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WHOA - FOUND THAT BUGGER...

Ensure that all open <div>-Tags are also closed by </div>, otherwise the display will be erroneous! --Soccer-holic^{I hear voices in my head...} 21:44, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Europa League play-offs

Some one trying to get a broad view of the above should receive a little introductory information in this section. This is my suggestion. Þjóðólfr (talk) 19:24, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on 2009–10 UEFA Europa League qualifying phase and play-off round. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:47, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]