Jump to content

Talk:2009–10 Newcastle United F.C. season

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

How about using collapsible boxes?

[edit]

The match list uses {{footballbox}} for match details. How would it be to use {{footballbox collapsible}} instead? This displays just the date, teams, score and venue with a "show" link to expand the match details (time, scorers and so on). I've an illustration with just a few matches (including fictional scores, etc) here, what do people think? Tonywalton Talk 10:13, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've gone ahead and been bold and done it. Please feel free to revert to non-collapsible boxes if this is offensive to you, but if you do don't forget to reinstate the ---- separators between the boxes (which the footballbox template doesn't supply but the collapisible version does). Tonywalton Talk 23:44, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You'll have to delete the football fixtures for league one. According to Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football/Archive_20#Fixtures, the fixtures are copyrighted. If you want, delete the fixtures but save the template so you can add the results when the matches are played (results aren't copyrighted).Mofs (talk) 13:08, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
These are not copyrightable, the discussion you link to is out of date. See the Guardian link posted below. --Thomas Btalk 04:49, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Having the list of Championship fixtures on this page is against copyright laws so I think they need to be removed as soon as possible. BigDom 12:38, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You can't copyright a list of events in the US, can you really engage in such abject nonsense in the UK? --Thomas Btalk 16:52, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This suggests no: http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2004/nov/10/football.business --Thomas Btalk 16:54, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No, the fixture lists are still subject to copyright and I have removed them. --Jameboy (talk) 01:15, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Further evidence that these are not copyrightable can be found here (PDF), in a comprehensive analysis of the rulings on the copyrightability of databases, specifically those on football fixtures, produced by the DG in Brussels. I'm not sure why you find your mere assertion more persuasive than third party evidence. Can you explain why I should believe you over the ECJ, perhaps with recourse to independent support? --Thomas Btalk 18:59, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

About your Third Opinion request: I've removed the {{3O}} banner template, since no request for a third opinion has been made at the WP:3O page. If a 3O is still desired, please follow the instructions there. TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 22:50, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on 2009–10 Newcastle United F.C. season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:23, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on 2009–10 Newcastle United F.C. season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:53, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on 2009–10 Newcastle United F.C. season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

☒N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:24, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2009–10 Newcastle United F.C. season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:14, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]