Talk:2009–10 Nebraska Cornhuskers women's basketball team

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

College basketball Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject College basketball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college basketball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College basketballWikipedia:WikiProject College basketballTemplate:WikiProject College basketballcollege basketball
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's sport: Basketball

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Women's basketball task force.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Sortable roster

FYI – I made the roster a sortable table. In order to make names sort by last name, make class sort in the expected way, and make heights sort the expected way, I added expressions like the following:

<span style="display:none">x</span>

For names, I replace “x” with the players last name.
For heights, I replaced “x” with zero, and used it for all inch values under 10.
For class, I replaced x with 1-4, as expected. I didn’t worry about distinguishing redshirt freshman form freshman, this approach will list redshirt freshman after freshman, as seems appropriate. It wouldn’t work for sophs, if that troubles someone they can adjust accordingly.

The upside is that the table is now sortable, the downside is that if the table is not complete or in error, someone adding to it might not see exactly what to do. This note should help.--SPhilbrick T 17:25, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]