Talk:2008 global rice crisis

Agriculture Low‑importance

	Agriculture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Economics Low‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Re-named or Merged?

This article needs to be re-named or merged with the 2008 food prices article. --Madchester (talk) 17:54, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree it could be re-named, perhaps to Global Rice Shortage Crisis or the like. But I disagree it should be merged with the 2008 food prices article (and it is already linked from a subsection there) because the Rice shortage is a major crisis in its own right: Merging it with 2007–2008 world food price crisis would probably cause that article to become too lengthy, prompting requests that a section on Rice shortage be spun off into its own article. Riceshortage (talk) 13:06, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Has now been renamed, disagree in principle to merge, merge only if this article does not grow beyond the three or four sections now present.KTo288 (talk) 07:51, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Current Events tag?

While the article technically doesn't yet warrant a current events tag, it will if editors around the world feel free to frequently update the article with breaking developments. A mild Catch-22 is involved, in that daily updating by more than one editor may tend to happen only if the article is tagged as a "Current Event." Riceshortage (talk) 13:15, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merged with Rice?

Conditionally, I'm OK with the article being merged with Rice, the reason I created the article in the first place is because of a surprising lack of explanation about the 'Rice shortage' crisis, in the article about Rice. If merged however, I strongly suggest that the section about the rice shortage be a significant subsection, and not just a few quick sentences about it. Riceshortage (talk) 07:36, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with a merge. This topic is important enough to warrant its own page, and more information will become available as the phenomenon progresses. Brisvegas 06:25, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree with mergeKTo288 (talk) 16:02, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merger with 'Rice' - my opinion

I think there should be an early reference on the 'Rice' page to a 'World food price rise' page (it will probably last longer than 2007-2008), and to any page about 'Rice shortage'. People will expect to see a reference to the shortage / price rise when they visit the 'Rice' page, but the subject is too large to be included on that page.

I favour the inclusion of 'Rice' as a heading under 'World food price rise', rather than having a separate page, to avoid duplication of discussion. If there are special factors involved for rice in particular, these can be given under the heading. PandaName (talk) 15:32, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree on merging with the rice page, since that's where I first looked when I was in search for this page. Iaberis (talk) 18:05, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

freerice.com

Does freerice.com contribute to the rice shortage? This website should be discussed in the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.122.87.33 (talk) 16:31, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

^this is spam and should be removed^98.70.220.188 (talk) 04:51, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2008 global rice crisis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080709000237/http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/84B4ED9E-DD71-4C2D-BA12-626A80052D09.htm to http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/84B4ED9E-DD71-4C2D-BA12-626A80052D09.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:32, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]